Perioperative Nimodipine and Postoperative Analgesia
Authors:
- Sally-Ann NortcliffeSNSally-Ann Nortcliffe
- Paul SharpePSPaul Sharpe
- D J. BuggyDBD J. Buggy
- 1 February 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Vol. 102 (2) , 504-508
Abstract
There is experimental evidence that nimodipine, an L-type dihydropiridine calcium channel blocker with relatively high blood-brain barrier penetration, enhances the antinociceptive properties of morphine. We tested the hypothesis that oral nimodipine taken preoperatively and 6 hourly for 48 h postoperatively would reduce visual analog scale pain scores and morphine consumption in morphine-naive patients with acute postoperative pain. Forty patients undergoing total knee replacement surgery (age 70 +/- 7 yr, 28 male) were randomized by computer-generated numbers to receive capsules containing either nimodipine 30 mg or placebo in a double-blind study design. All patients received 3 capsules (nimodipine 90 mg or placebo) 1-2 h before induction of anesthesia followed by oral nimodipine 30 mg or placebo 6 hourly for 48 hours postoperatively. Spinal anesthesia was induced with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (2.4-3.0 mL) and fluids and ephedrine were given at the discretion of the anesthesiologist. Morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA, bolus 1 mg, lockout 5 min) was given for postoperative analgesia. Primary outcome measures were visual analog pain scores at rest and on moving (sitting forward) and PCA morphine consumption. Morphine consumption was significantly larger in nimodipine patients at 12 h (39 +/- 18 versus 29 +/- 15; P = 0.04), 24 h (62 +/- 23 versus 45 +/- 24; P = 0.02), and 48 h (88 +/- 34 versus 61 +/- 27; P = 0.01). There were no significant differences in pain scores at rest or moving or in time to first use of morphine analgesia. This study has demonstrated increased morphine consumption after 12 h in postoperative patients receiving nimodipine, suggesting that, in patients undergoing knee replacement surgery, it has no adjunctive analgesic effect and may actually inhibit the analgesic effect of morphine.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does the opioid-sparing effect of rectal diclofenac following total abdominal hysterectomy benefit the patient?British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2002
- Role of L-type Ca2+channels in attenuated morphine antinociception in streptozotocin-diabetic ratsEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 2001
- A Comparative Study with Oral Nifedipine, Intravenous Nimodipine, and Magnesium Sulfate in Postoperative AnalgesiaAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2000
- Nimodipine-enhanced opiate analgesia in cancer patients requiring morphine dose escalation: a double-blind, placebo-controlled studyPain, 1998
- Epidural Verapamil Reduces Analgesic Consumption After Lower Abdominal SurgeryAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1998
- Nimodipine fails to enhance the analgesic effect of slow release morphine in the early phases of cancer pain treatmentPain, 1996
- Analgesia with epidural nimodipineThe Lancet, 1993
- Contribution of central neuroplasticity to pathological pain: review of clinical and experimental evidencePain, 1993
- Effects of elevated calcium and calcium antagonists on 6,7-benzomorphan-induced analgesiaEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 1983
- Cerebral Arterial Spasm – A Controlled Trial of Nimodipine in Patients with Subarachnoid HemorrhageNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983