When Age Matters: How Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy in Managing Negative Emotions Can Mitigate the Effects of Emotional Inertia for Younger Workers
Authors:
- Simone TavolucciSTSimone Tavolucci
- Lorenzo FilosaLFLorenzo Filosa
- Valentina SommovigoValentina Sommovigo
- Valentina RosaVRValentina Rosa
- Fabio AliverniniFAFabio Alivernini
- Roberto BaioccoRBRoberto Baiocco
- Anna BorghiABAnna Borghi
- Andrea ChiricoACAndrea Chirico
- Chiara FiniCFChiara Fini
- Tommaso PalombiTPTommaso Palombi
- Jessica PistellaJPJessica Pistella
- Fabio LucidiFLFabio Lucidi
Open Access
- 19 August 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Healthcare
- Vol. 13 (16) , 2047
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Negative emotional inertia describes the extent to which a prior emotional state can predict the subsequent one, and it is considered a significant indicator of psychological maladjustment that has several negative consequences in the workplace. The current study tested a theoretical model in which the inertia of negative emotions is moderated by regulatory emotional self-efficacy beliefs (RESE) in managing negative affects across workers of different ages. Specifically, we hypothesized that RESE moderates the relation between negative emotions at consecutive time points, reducing their persistence, and that age would influence this relation, with older workers relying less on this resource than younger ones. Methods: Participants were 221 workers (57.8% females) exposed to social work stressors who reported their affectivity every evening for 31 consecutive days. We analyzed the data using dynamic structural equation models (DSEM), which enable examining within-person time series trends while estimating individual differences therein. Results/Conclusions: In line with our predictions, results suggest that emotional self-efficacy is a key personal resource that might be able to buffer individuals from emotional stasis, a resource primarily useful for younger workers who rely less on actual emotional regulation expertise than older adults.Keywords
Funding Information
- European Commission (DM 1557 11.10.2022, CUP B53C22002050004, RG11816433CBD8D3, AR1241906E5C24B6)
- European Commission (DM 1557 11.10.2022, CUP B53C22002050004, RG11816433CBD8D3, AR1241906E5C24B6)
- Sapienza Università di Roma (DM 1557 11.10.2022, CUP B53C22002050004, RG11816433CBD8D3, AR1241906E5C24B6)
- Sapienza Università di Roma (DM 1557 11.10.2022, CUP B53C22002050004, RG11816433CBD8D3, AR1241906E5C24B6)
This publication has 122 references indexed in Scilit:
- Changing feelings: Individual differences in emotional inertia2024
- Daily cortisol variations are predicted proximally by self-efficacy beliefs at work and indirectly by perceived self-regulatory abilities in managing negative emotionsInternational Journal of Psychophysiology, 2023
- Regulatory emotional self-efficacy beliefs matter for (mal)adjustment: A meta-analysisCurrent Psychology, 2022
- Inertia of emotions and inertia of the heart: Physiological processes underlying inertia of negative emotions at workInternational Journal of Psychophysiology, 2020
- Chronic job burnout and daily functioning: A theoretical analysisBurnout Research, 2014
- What Makes Us Enthusiastic, Angry, Feeling at Rest or Worried? Development and Validation of an Affective Work Events Taxonomy Using Concept Mapping MethodologyJournal of Business and Psychology, 2013
- Emotional Stability and Affective Self–regulatory Efficacy Beliefs: Proofs of Integration between Trait Theory and Social Cognitive TheoryEuropean Journal of Personality, 2013
- What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational ResearchJournal of Business and Psychology, 2010
- Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic reviewClinical Psychology Review, 2010
- Affect intensity, coping styles, mood regulation expectancies, and depressive symptomsPersonality and Individual Differences, 1996