High-risk features in potentially resectable colon cancer: a prospective MDCT-pathology agreement study
- 17 June 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Abdominal Radiology
- Vol. 41 (10) , 1877-1890
Abstract
Purpose Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in potentially resectable high-risk Stage II and Stage III colon cancer has demonstrated promising results in the PRODIGE 22—ECKINOXE Phase II trial. Identification of adverse morphologic features, namely T3 with >5 mm extramural extension/T4 stages and/or N2, is fundamental and requires accurate noninvasive imaging. Our aim was to assess the value of optimized preoperative MDCT to stratify potentially resectable colon cancer patients for neoadjuvant therapy. Methods this is an observational prospective cross-sectional radiologic-pathologic agreement study. All patients with colon cancer referred to our Institution’s Radiology department for preoperative MDCT staging between 01-10-2013 and 11-02-2015 underwent independent reading based on axial and multiplanar reconstruction images by 3 radiologists with 3, 6, and 20 years of experience in gastrointestinal radiology. T stage, extramural extension if T3 (≤5 mm or >5 mm), and N stage were recorded. Surgical specimens subsequently obtained underwent micro-pathologic analysis by a gastrointestinal pathologist with 9 years of experience in gastrointestinal pathology. Main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, AUROC, diagnostic accuracy, and interobserver agreement of optimized MDCT, and pathologic analysis of the surgical specimen considered the reference standard. Results 74 patients [43 males; median age 73 (45–89)] were eligible. MDCT sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, AUROC, and diagnostic accuracy ranged between 42.9–76.2, 75.5–90.6, 55.2–76.2, 80.0–90.6, 0.67–0.83 and 0.76–0.86%, respectively, for the identification of T3 > 5 mm/T4 disease, with moderate interobserver agreement (0.49); and 8.3–33.3, 93.5–98.4, 20–66.7, 84.1–88.2, 0.51–0.65 and 0.80–0.86%, respectively, for the identification of N2 disease, with absent interobserver agreement (0.10). Conclusions Specificity of MDCT in the stratification of patients for neoadjuvant therapy may be high enough to prevent overtreatment. However, it may lead to undertreatment in a meaningful proportion of patients. Observer performance may benefit from targeted training programs, given the variability and observer dependence of the results. Limitations include 4-slice MDCT equipment, time to surgery and lack of long-term outcome information based on imaging parameters per se.Keywords
Funding Information
- Hospital Prof. Dr. Fernando Fonseca
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Feasibility of preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced, operable colon cancer: the pilot phase of a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet Oncology, 2012
- The oncological outcome after right hemicolectomy and accuracy of CT scan as a preoperative tool for staging in right sided colonic cancersColorectal Disease, 2012
- Inclusion of computed tomographic colonography on pre-operative CT for patients with colorectal cancerEuropean Journal of Radiology, 2012
- Accuracy of radiological staging in identifying high‐risk colon cancer patients suitable for neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multicentre experienceColorectal Disease, 2011
- Diagnostic precision of CT in local staging of colon cancers: a meta-analysisClinical Radiology, 2010
- Accuracy of multidetector computed tomography in identifying poor prognostic factors in colonic cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2010
- CT staging of colon cancerClinical Radiology, 2008
- Extent of Mesorectal Tumor Invasion as a Prognostic Factor After Curative Surgery for T3 Rectal Cancer PatientsAnnals of Surgery, 2006
- Impact of T and N Stage and Treatment on Survival and Relapse in Adjuvant Rectal CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Prognostic factors in Stage T2NO rectal cancerDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1999