Actigraphy of Wrist and Ankle for Measuring Sleep Duration in Altitude Travelers
- 1 September 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in High Altitude Medicine & Biology
- Vol. 17 (3) , 194-202
Abstract
Latshang, Tsogyal Daniela, Daniela Juliana Mueller, Christian Maurizio Lo Cascio, Anne-Christin Stöwhas, Katrin Stadelmann, Noemi Tesler, Peter Achermann, Reto Huber, Malcolm Kohler, and Konrad Ernst Bloch. Actigraphy of wrist and ankle for measuring sleep duration in altitude travelers. High Alt Med Biol. 17:194–202, 2016—Aims: Actigraphy might be convenient to assess sleep disturbances in altitude field studies. Therefore, we evaluated whether actigraphy accurately measures sleep duration in healthy subjects traveling to altitude. Methods: Fifty-one healthy men, aged mean ± standard deviation (SD) 27 ± 9 years, were studied during one night at Zurich (490 m), two nights at Davos Wolfgang (1630 m), and two nights at Jakobshorn (2590 m), in randomized order. Sleep duration measured by actigraphy, using a one-axis device at the wrist (n = 51), a three-axis device at the other wrist, and a three-axis device at the ankle (n = 22), was compared with corresponding total sleep time (TST) measured by polysomnography. Results: During 255 polysomnographic overnight studies, 449 paired actigraphic recordings were obtained. The median polysomnographic-derived TST ranged from 397 to 408 minutes. Actigraphic mean TST from wrists with one-axis and three-axis devices, and from ankle agreed well with polysomnographic values with a bias of +1, −7, +6 minutes, respectively. Corresponding limits of agreement (±2 SD of bias) were ±51, ±60, and ±59 minutes. Limits of agreement of mean TST over five nights by actigraphy and polysomnography were similar to the coefficient of repeatability (2 SD of mean) of polysomnographic TST, that is, ±31, ±38, and ±36 minutes versus ±34 minutes. Conclusions: Actigraphy of the wrist or ankle by a one-axis or a three-axis device accurately estimates mean TST in groups of subjects and mean TST over several nights in individuals traveling to altitude. Therefore, actigraphy is valuable for assessing effects of altitude and other environmental influences on sleep duration during field studies over extended periods.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring Sleep: Accuracy, Sensitivity, and Specificity of Wrist Actigraphy Compared to PolysomnographySLEEP, 2013
- Quantitative Changes in the Sleep EEG at Moderate Altitude (1630 m and 2590 m)PLOS ONE, 2013
- A comparison of the Actigraph GT1M and GT3X accelerometers under standardized and free-living conditionsPhysiological Measurement, 2012
- High Altitude Sleep Disturbances Monitored by Actigraphy and PolysomnographyHigh Altitude Medicine & Biology, 2011
- Wrist ActigraphyChest, 2011
- Comparison of actigraphy with polysomnography and sleep logs in depressed insomniacsJournal of Sleep Research, 2011
- Patient Participation and Physical Activity During Rehabilitation and Future Functional Outcomes in Patients After Hip FractureArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2009
- Measuring Activity Patterns Using Actigraphy in Multiple SclerosisChronobiology International, 2007
- Accuracy of Nasal Cannula Pressure Recordings for Assessment of Ventilation during SleepAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2001
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986