Grading student problem solutions: The challenge of sending a consistent message
- 14 January 2004
- journal article
- Published by American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) in American Journal of Physics
- Vol. 72 (2) , 164-169
Abstract
Grading sends a direct message to students about what is expected in class. However, often there is a gap between the assigned grade and the goals of the instructor. In an interview study of faculty teaching calculus-based introductory physics, we verified that this gap exists and identified three themes that appear to shape grading decisions: (1) a desire to see student reasoning, (2) a reluctance to deduct points from a student solution that might be correct, and (3) a tendency to project correct thought processes onto a student solution. When all three themes were expressed by an instructor, the resulting conflict was resolved by placing the burden of proof on either the instructor or the student. The weighting of the themes with the burden of proof criterion explains our finding that although almost all instructors reported telling students to show their reasoning in problem solutions, about half graded problem solutions in a way that would likely discourage students from showing this reasoning.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Teaching scientific thinking skills: Students and computers coaching each otherAmerican Journal of Physics, 1999
- Another reason that physics students learn by roteAmerican Journal of Physics, 1999
- Assessment and Classroom LearningAssessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 1998
- Using qualitative problem-solving strategies to highlight the role of conceptual knowledge in solving problemsAmerican Journal of Physics, 1996
- Promoting skilled problem‐solving behavior among beginning physics studentsJournal of Research in Science Teaching, 1993
- Overview, Case Study PhysicsAmerican Journal of Physics, 1991
- Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research-based instructional strategiesAmerican Journal of Physics, 1991
- The Content of Physics Self-ExplanationsJournal of the Learning Sciences, 1991
- When Good Teaching Leads to Bad Results: The Disasters of 'Well-Taught' Mathematics CoursesEducational Psychologist, 1988
- Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices*Cognitive Science, 1981