Radiation Dose to Patients and Radiologists During Transcatheter Arterial Embolization: Comparison of a Digital Flat-Panel System and Conventional Unit
Authors:
- 1 October 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Roentgen Ray Society in American Journal of Roentgenology
- Vol. 185 (4) , 855-859
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to evaluate the exposure doses to patients and radiologists during transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using a new angiographic unit with a digital flat-panel system. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Doses were assessed for 24 procedures: 12 using a new unit with a digital flat-panel system and 12 using a conventional unit. Doses to patients' skin were evaluated with thermoluminescent dosimeters behind the left, middle, and right portions of the liver. The doses to the radiologists were measured by an electronic personal dosimeter placed on the chest outside a lead protector. The maximal skin doses to the patients and the dose equivalents, Hp(0.07), to the radiologists were compared between the two procedure groups with each angiographic unit. RESULTS. For procedures with the new unit, the mean maximal skin dose to the patients was 284 ± 127 (SD) mGy (range, 130–467 mGy), and Hp(0.07) to the radiologists was 62.8 ± 17.4 μSv. For procedures with the conventional unit, the maximal skin dose to the patients was 1,068 ± 439 mGy (range, 510–1,882 mGy), and Hp(0.07) to the radiologists was 68.4 ± 25.7 μSv. The maximal skin dose to the patients was significantly lower with the new unit than with the conventional unit (p < 0.0005). There was no significant difference in the Hp(0.07) to the radiologists between the two procedure groups. CONCLUSION. The new digital flat-panel system for angiographic imaging can reduce the radiation dose to patients' skin during TAE for HCC as compared with the conventional system.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of a conventional and a flat-panel digital system in interventional cardiology proceduresBritish Journal of Radiology, 2004
- Evaluation and Estimation of Entrance Skin Dose in Patients During Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology ProceduresJapanese Journal of Radiological Technology, 2004
- Patient Absorbed Dose in Coronary Angiography Determined by the Flat Panel Digital Detector X-ray SystemJapanese Journal of Radiological Technology, 2003
- Simulated Bone Erosions in a Hand Phantom: Detection with Conventional Screen-Film Technology versus Cesium Iodide-Amorphous Silicon Flat-Panel DetectorRadiology, 2000
- Clinical application of a flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1998
- Detection of Simulated Chest Lesions with Normal and Reduced Radiation DoseInvestigative Radiology, 1998
- Amorphous Silicon, Flat-Panel, X-Ray Detector Versus Screen-Film RadiographyInvestigative Radiology, 1998
- Flat-Panel X-Ray Detector Using Amorphous Silicon TechnologyInvestigative Radiology, 1997
- Potential Biological Effects Following High X-ray Dose Interventional ProceduresJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 1994
- Temporal and Spatial Marrow Dose from 90Sr-90Y in BeaglesHealth Physics, 1975