A modified technique for extraoral cementation of implant retained restorations for preventing excess cement around the margins
Open Access
- 1 January 2014
- journal article
- Published by The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics in The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
- Vol. 6 (2) , 146-9
Abstract
The major drawback of cement-retained restorations is the extrusion of the excess cement into the peri-implant sulcus, with subsequent complications. Insufficient removal of the excess cement may initiate a local inflammatory process, which may lead to implant failure. This article presents a method of controlling cement flow on implant abutments, minimizing the excess cement around implant-retained restorations.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Screw- Versus Cement-Retained Implant Restorations: Current ConceptsImplant Dentistry, 2010
- Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review.2003
- Infectious risks for oral implants: a review of the literatureClinical Oral Implants Research, 2002
- Complications associated with excess cement around crowns on osseointegrated implants: a clinical report.1999
- A prospective clinical evaluation of different single‐tooth restoration designs on osseointegrated implants. A 3‐year follow‐up of Brånemark implants.Clinical Oral Implants Research, 1999
- A new gingival retraction impression system for a one-stage root-form implantThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1998
- Retrospective review of 1170 endosseous implants placed in partially edentulous jawsThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1998
- Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: Achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistryThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1997
- Clinical effectiveness of implant-supported single-tooth replacement: the Toronto Study.1996
- Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part IThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1992