Body composition and bone mineral density in premenopausal and early perimenopausal women
- 1 November 1995
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Vol. 10 (11) , 1762-1768
Abstract
Body composition appears to be an important determinant of bone mineral density (BMD). BMD at the femoral neck, lumbar spine, and whole‐body and the whole‐body soft‐tissue composition were measured cross‐sectionally in 334 healthy premenopausal and early perimenopausal women, aged 44–50 years, using a Hologic QDR densitometer. Correlations between lean mass and BMD at the hip, spine, and whole‐body were greater (r = 0.40, r = 0.44, and r = 0.45, respectively, p < 0.0001) than those for fat mass (r = 0.19, r = 0.16, and r = 0.16, respectively, p < 0.01). There was a significant linear trend in femoral BMD from the lowest to highest category of lean mass (0.75 ± 0.10 g/cm2, 0.80 ± 0.10 g/cm2, and 0.86 ± 0.09 g/cm2, p < 0.0001). Similar trends were demonstrated for spinal and whole‐body density. For categories of fat mass, there was a significant linear trend at the hip (0.78 ± 0.10 g/cm2, 0.79 ± 0.10 g/cm2, and 0.83 ± 0.10 g/cm2, p = 0.0106), but not at the spine or whole‐body. There was a 5.00% (3.62, 6.38; 95% confidence limits) difference in hip BMD per unit (standard deviation) of lean mass, while only a 0.73% (‐0.66, 2.11) difference in hip BMD per unit (SD) of fat mass. Differences in BMD were examined by categories of lean and fat mass (low, medium, high) for a total of nine possible combinations of lean and fat measures. BMD at the hip, spine, and whole‐body were significantly higher in those with high lean mass than in those with low lean mass, irrespective of fat mass. Women with high lean/low fat had similar hip, spinal, and whole‐body BMD as those with high lean/high fat, despite their significantly lower body weight (62.5 ± 3.3 kg vs 85.7 ± 5.4 kg, respectively, p < 0.0001). In premenopausal and early perimenopausal women, body weight alone may not be associated with increased bone mass unless a significant proportion of that weight is comprised of lean mass. The stronger association between lean mass and BMD than that for fat mass may be attributed to differences in determinants of lean mass, such as exercise, lifestyle factors, estrogen levels, or a combination of these factors.Keywords
Funding Information
- Merck and Company Inc. (HL45167, T32 AG00181)
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Heritable and life-style determinants of bone mineral densityJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1993
- New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry dataJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1992
- Bone mass and body composition in normal womenJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1992
- Body composition, age and femoral bone mass of young adult womenAnnals of Epidemiology, 1991
- Bone mass and anthropometric measurements in adult femalesBone and Mineral, 1990
- Menopause and Risk Factors for Coronary Heart DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Relationship Between Bone Mineral Density of Spine and Strength of Back Extensors in Healthy Postmenopausal WomenMayo Clinic Proceedings, 1986
- Capacitative pulsed electric stimulation of bone cells. Induction of cyclic-AMP changes and DNA synthesisBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research, 1984
- Skeletal mass and body composition in marathon runnersMetabolism, 1978
- RELATION BETWEEN BONE MASS AND MUSCLE WEIGHTThe Lancet, 1970