Conservation professionals agree on challenges to coexisting with large carnivores but not on solutions
Authors:
- Michelle L. LuteMLMichelle L. Lute
- Neil H. CarterNCNeil H. Carter
- José V. López-BaoJLJosé V. López-Bao
- John D.C. LinnellJLJohn D.C. Linnell
- 1 February 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Biological Conservation
- Vol. 218, 223-232
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Boise State University
- Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry
- National Science Foundation (RYC-2015-18932)
- National Science Foundation (IIA-1301792)
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Conserving large carnivores: dollars and fenceEcology Letters, 2013
- Understanding and managing conservation conflictsTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2013
- Human–felid conflict as a further handicap to the conservation of the critically endangered Iberian lynxEuropean Journal of Wildlife Research, 2013
- Survey Mode Effects on Valuation of Environmental GoodsInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2011
- An Extension and Further Validation of the Potential for Conflict IndexLeisure Sciences, 2010
- Balancing Emotion and Cognition: a Case for Decision Aiding in Conservation EffortsConservation Biology, 2008
- Finding common ground in large carnivore conservation: mapping contending perspectivesEnvironmental Science & Policy, 2006
- Conservation and the Myth of ConsensusConservation Biology, 2005
- Communicating Judgments About Practical Significance: Effect Size, Confidence Intervals and Odds RatiosHuman Dimensions of Wildlife, 2002
- A Science for Survival: Values and Conservation BiologyConservation Biology, 1996