The Novelty Penalty
- 31 January 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 28 (3) , 380-394
Abstract
People often tell each other stories about their past experiences. But do they tell the right ones? Speakers and listeners predicted that listeners would enjoy hearing novel stories (i.e., stories about experiences the listeners had never had) more than familiar stories (i.e., stories about experiences the listeners had already had). In fact, listeners enjoyed hearing familiar stories much more than novel ones (Studies 1 and 2). This did not happen because the familiar and novel stories differed in their content or delivery (Study 3). Rather, it happened because human speech is riddled with informational gaps, and familiar stories allow listeners to use their own knowledge to fill in those gaps (Study 4). We discuss reasons why novel stories are more difficult to tell, and why familiar stories are more enjoyable to hear, than either speakers or listeners expect.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Unforeseen Costs of Extraordinary ExperiencePsychological Science, 2014
- Shared Experiences Are AmplifiedPsychological Science, 2014
- Gossip as Cultural LearningReview of General Psychology, 2004
- Gossip in Evolutionary PerspectiveReview of General Psychology, 2004
- Politeness1987
- Collaborating on contributions to conversationsLanguage and Cognitive Processes, 1987
- Referring as a collaborative processCognition, 1986
- Discourse Analysis1983
- Common ground at the understanding of demonstrative referenceJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1983
- The effect of familiarity on preferences for surnamesBritish Journal of Psychology, 1981