Lymphovascular invasion determines the outcome of stage I colorectal cancer patients
Authors:
- Shih-Ching ChangSCShih-Ching Chang
- Chun-Chi LinCLChun-Chi Lin
- Huann-Sheng WangHWHuann-Sheng Wang
- Shung-Haur YangSYShung-Haur Yang
- Jeng-Kai JiangJJJeng-Kai Jiang
- Yuan-Tzu LanYLYuan-Tzu Lan
- Tzu-Chen LinTLTzu-Chen Lin
- Anna Fen-Yau LiALAnna Fen-Yau Li
- Wei-Shone ChenWCWei-Shone Chen
- Jen-Kou LinJLJen-Kou Lin
- 1 October 2012
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Formosan Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 45 (5) , 141-145
Abstract
SummaryIntroductionThe outcome of stage I colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is excellent. However, even after radical surgery, 10% of patients develop tumor recurrence or metastasis.AimThe aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of clinicopathologic features to identify high-risk stage I CRC patients.MethodsA total of 292 stage I CRC patients undergoing curative-intention surgery at Taipei Veterans General Hospital between 2000 and 2006 were enrolled. The measured end point was the postoperative disease-free survival (DFS).ResultsOf 292 cases, 185 (63.4%) had tumors of T2 stage, 16 (5.5%) had lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and 68 (23.3%) had a carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level of higher than 5 ng/mL. With a median follow-up period of 60 months (range, 6–130 months), CRC recurred in 23 patients. Overall, 5-year DFS was 88.7% in stage I disease patients. In the univariate analysis, 5-year DFS of patients with LVI was 52.7%, which was significantly poorer than that of patients without LVI (90.9%). Patients with a high CEA level or T2 lesion had a poor 5-year DFS, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. In the multivariate analysis, the only important independent factor affecting the 5-year DFS was LVI (hazard ratio = 4.27; 95% confidence interval: 1.88–9.68; p = 0.001). In the T1 disease, 5-year DFS of patients with LVI was 60.0%, significantly poorer than that of patients without LVI (93.4%; p = 0.045). In the T2 disease, the difference of 5-year DFS between patients with and without LVI was more significant (50.5% vs. 85.1%; p = 0.003).ConclusionStage I CRC patients in this study had an excellent outcome. Prognosis of patients having tumor with LVI was poor and should receive an aggressive follow-up protocolKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surgical Quality and Nodal Ultrastaging Is Associated With Long-Term Disease-Free Survival in Early Colorectal CancerAnnals of Surgery, 2010
- Nodal Staging Score: A Tool to Assess Adequate Staging of Node-Negative Colon CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Is Occult Lymph Node Disease in Colorectal Cancer Patients Clinically Significant?The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 2007
- Lymph Node Evaluation and Survival After Curative Resection of Colon Cancer: Systematic ReviewJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2007
- The Prognostic Effect of Micrometastases in Previously Staged Lymph Node Negative (N0) Colorectal Carcinoma: A Meta-analysisAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2006
- The importance of accurate pathological assessment of lymph node involvement in colorectal cancerColorectal Disease, 2006
- Lymph node counts, rates of positive lymph nodes, and patient survival for colon cancer surgery in Ontario, Canada: A population-based studyJournal of Surgical Oncology, 2006
- High prevalence of isolated tumour cells in regional lymph nodes from pN0 colorectal cancerJournal of Clinical Pathology, 2006
- Lymph Node Evaluation in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Population-Based StudyJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005
- Lymph node metastasis in T1 adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectumJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2004