Accuracy between optical and inertial motion capture systems for assessing trunk speed during preferred gait and transition periods
- 12 January 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Sports Biomechanics
- Vol. 18 (4) , 366-377
Abstract
Motion capture through inertial sensors is becoming popular, but its accuracy to describe kinematics during changes in walking speed is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of trunk speed extracted using an inertial motion system compared to a gold standard optical motion system, during steady walking and stationary periods. Eleven participants walked on pre-established paths marked on the floor. Between each lap, a 1-second stationary transition period at the initial position was included prior to the next lap. Resultant trunk speed during the walking and transition periods were extracted from an inertial (240 Hz sampling rate) and an optical system (120 Hz sampling rate) to calculate the agreement (Pearson’s correlation coefficient) and relative root mean square errors between both systems. The agreement for the resultant trunk speed between the inertial system and the optical system was strong (0.67 < r ≤ 0.9) for both walking and transition periods. Moreover, relative root mean square error during the transition periods was greater in comparison to the walking periods (>40% across all paths). It was concluded that trunk speed extracted from inertial systems have fair accuracy during walking, but the accuracy was reduced in the transition periods.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inertial Measures of Motion for Clinical Biomechanics: Comparative Assessment of Accuracy under Controlled Conditions - Effect of VelocityPLOS ONE, 2013
- Data Fusion Algorithms for Multiple Inertial Measurement UnitsSensors, 2011
- Accuracy of Inertial Motion Sensors in Static, Quasistatic, and Complex Dynamic MotionJournal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2009
- Magnetic distortion in motion labs, implications for validating inertial magnetic sensorsGait & Posture, 2009
- Dynamic accuracy of inertial measurement units during simple pendulum motionComputer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2008
- Comparison of linear accelerations from three measurement systems during “reach & grasp”Medical Engineering & Physics, 2006
- Compensation of magnetic disturbances improves inertial and magnetic sensing of human body segment orientationIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2005
- Comparison of kinematic and kinetic methods for computing the vertical motion of the body center of mass during walkingHuman Movement Science, 2004
- Estimation of speed and incline of walking using neural networkIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 1995
- Interpretation of the Correlation Coefficient: A Basic ReviewJournal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, 1990