Achievement of textbook outcomes and comparisons with benchmark values after laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy
Authors:
- 13 January 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Updates in Surgery
- Vol. 74 (4) , 1299-1306
Abstract
Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLLS) is considered a standard approach for patients. Textbook outcomes (TOs) with benchmark values have been developed to help centers assess their outcomes of LLLS. The aim of our study was to identify factors associated with achieving TOs after LLLS. This is a retrospective cohort study including 195 patients undergoing LLLS between January 2004 and December 2018. Our outcomes were compared to benchmark values and graded as similar, better, or worse. A TO was achieved in 106 patients (54.4%). The main determinant for achieving a TO was prolonged hospital stay. Year of surgery [P = 0.002; odds ratio (OR) 3.913, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.666–9.188], American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (P = 0.015; OR 0.104, 95% CI 0.017–0.650), body mass index (BMI) score (P = 0.075; OR 1.135, 95% CI 0.988–1.304), inflow clamping > 40 min (P = 0.037; OR 0.090, 95% CI 0.009–0.867) and operation time (P = 0.002; OR 0.991, 95% CI 0.985–0.997) were the factors associated with achieving a TO. Our outcomes were similar to the benchmark values for all criteria, except for the transfusion rate (our study vs benchmark values; 6.2% vs 3.8%), which was worse in our patients. We achieved better outcomes with a lower conversion rate (4.6% vs 7.2%), fewer patients requiring massive transfusion (4.1% vs 8.3%), lower rate of prolonged inflow clamping (3.9% vs 6.3%), lower overall complication rate (11.9% vs 19.8%), lower reoperation rate (0% vs 3.4%), and fewer patients with a positive margin (1.5% vs 10.8%). Year of surgery, ASA score, inflow clamping > 40 min and operation time were independently associated with failure to achieve a TO. TOs are useful tools to measure the surgical outcomes and compare surgical performance with benchmark values. TOs also offer a new method to retrospectively compare outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Korean ExperiencesLiver Cancer, 2013
- The Relative Importance of Quality of Care Information When Choosing a Hospital for Surgical TreatmentMedical Decision Making, 2010
- The International Position on Laparoscopic Liver SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 2009
- Techniques for performing laparoscopic liver resection in various hepatic locationsJournal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, 2009
- Laparoscopic liver sectionectomy 2 and 3 (LLS 2 and 3): towards the “gold standard”Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, 2009
- Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy: A comparative studyEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2008
- Laparoscopy as a routine approach for left lateral sectionectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 2006
- Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy and left lateral segmentectomy: Technique and results of a clinical seriesSurgery, 1996
- Laparoscopic anatomical (hepatic) left lateral segmentectomy—technical aspectsSurgical Endoscopy, 1996
- The quality of care. How can it be assessed?JAMA, 1988