Examining the Doctorate: Institutional policy and the PhD examination process in Britain
Authors:
- 1 June 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Studies in Higher Education
- Vol. 25 (2) , 167-180
Abstract
In this article the authors attempt to shed some light on the PhD examination process, a process that is arguably far less transparent than those at other levels of British higher education. More specifically, the authors focus upon institutional policy from a sample of 20 British universities and attempt to document policy and interrogate the principles underpinning guidelines governing examination practices. They examine definitions of what constitutes a doctorate and policies governing a range of practices that are integral to the examination process. The research reveals that although there is a large degree of inter-institutional consistency regarding key criteria for the award of a PhD, close inspection of institutional policy suggests that the PhD examination is in fact conceptualised and operationalised in diverse ways.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- A National Profile of Research Degree Awards: Innovation, Clarity and CoherenceHigher Education Quarterly, 1999
- Creating a Delicate Balance: the doctoral supervisor's dilemmasTeaching in Higher Education, 1998
- Critical Mass and Pedagogic Continuity: studies in academic habitusBritish Journal of Sociology of Education, 1997
- A complex craft: United Kingdom PhD supervision in the social sciencesResearch in Post-Compulsory Education, 1997
- Critical mass and doctoral research: Reflections on the Harris reportStudies in Higher Education, 1997
- Change and the Social Science PhD: supervisors’ responsesOxford Review of Education, 1995
- Establishing Boundaries: problems and solutions in managing the PhD supervisor's roleCambridge Journal of Education, 1994
- The social science PhD: A literature reviewStudies in Higher Education, 1991
- Gender and British Postgraduate Funding Policy: a critique of the Winfield ReportGender and Education, 1989
- Degrees of Difference?: The Ph.D. and the Ed.D.The Review of Higher Education, 1987