Capacity to Consent to Research Participation in Adults With Malignant Glioma
- 20 August 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 28 (24) , 3844-3850
Abstract
Purpose To investigate research consent capacity (RCC) in patients with malignant gliomas (MGs) and identify cognitive abilities and clinical factors associated with RCC in MG. Patients and Methods Participants were 22 healthy controls and 26 patients with diagnosed and histologically verified MG. All patients with MG were receiving various combinations of treatment (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, medication). Both groups were administered a neurocognitive test battery and a standardized RCC measure (Capacity to Consent to Research Instrument [CCRI]). Capacity performance was evaluated across four core consent abilities (choice, appreciation, reasoning, understanding), and categorical capacity impairment ratings (no impairment, mild/moderate impairment, severe impairment) were also identified for individual patients with MG. Stepwise regression analyses identified cognitive predictors of CCRI performance in the MG group. Results The MG patient group performed significantly below the control group on the three clinically relevant consent standards (appreciation, reasoning, and understanding). Patients with MG performed equivalently to controls in evidencing a simple research participation choice. Approximately one third of patients with MG showed compromised impairment ratings (mild/moderate impairment or severe impairment) on the three consent abilities. Cognitive measures of phonemic and semantic word fluency predicted performance on the consent standards. Steroid treatment and anticonvulsant use were related to poorer CCRI performance. Conclusion A substantial portion of patients with MG after diagnosis show impairments in research consent capacity. Word fluency measures reflecting expressive language and executive function abilities are strongly associated with these consent impairments. This study highlights the importance of careful attention to consent issues when enrolling patients with MG in clinical trials and other research studies.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Medical decision-making capacity in patients with malignant gliomaNeurology, 2009
- Decisional Capacity for Research Participation in Individuals with Mild Cognitive ImpairmentJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2008
- Cognitive models of medical decision-making capacity in patients with mild cognitive impairmentJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2008
- Assessment of Patients' Competence to Consent to TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Detrimental Effects of Tumor Progression on Cognitive Function of Patients With High-Grade GliomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Cognitive Impairment in Patients With Brain Tumors: Assessment and Intervention in the Clinic SettingClinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 2006
- Role and Relevance of Neurocognitive Assessment in Clinical Trials of Patients With CNS TumorsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Prospective Study of Quality of Life in Adults with Newly Diagnosed High-grade GliomasJournal of Neuro-Oncology, 2005
- Factor Analysis of Four Measures of Prefrontal Lobe FunctioningArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1998
- The hopkins verbal learning test: Development of a new memory test with six equivalent formsThe Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1991