Stability of Contour Augmentation and Esthetic Outcomes of Implant‐Supported Single Crowns in the Esthetic Zone: 3‐Year Results of a Prospective Study With Early Implant Placement Postextraction
Authors:
- Daniel BuserDBDaniel Buser
- Julia WittnebenJWJulia Wittneben
- Michael M. BornsteinMBMichael M. Bornstein
- Linda GrütterLGLinda Grütter
- Vivianne ChappuisVCVivianne Chappuis
- Urs C. BelserUBUrs C. Belser
- 1 March 2011
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Periodontology
- Vol. 82 (3) , 342-349
Abstract
Background: Early implant placement is one of the treatment options after tooth extraction. Implant surgery is performed after a healing period of 4 to 8 weeks and combined with a simultaneous contour augmentation using the guided bone regeneration technique to rebuild stable esthetic facial hard‐ and soft‐tissue contours.Methods: In this prospective study, 20 patients were treated with an implant‐born single crown and followed for 3 years. Clinical, radiologic, and esthetic parameters were recorded to assess treatment outcomes.Results: At the 3‐year examination, all 20 implants were successfully integrated, demonstrating ankylotic stability and healthy peri‐implant soft tissues as documented by standard clinical parameters. Esthetic outcomes were assessed by the pink esthetic score (PES) and white esthetic score (WES) and confirmed pleasing results overall. WES values were slightly superior to PES values. Periapical radiographs showed minimal crestal bone loss around used bone‐level implants with a mean bone loss of 0.18 mm at 3 years. Only two implants revealed bone loss between 0.5 and 1.0 mm. One of these implants had minor mucosal recession Conclusions: This prospective study evaluates the concept of early implant placement and demonstrated successful tissue integration for all 20 implants and stable bone‐crest levels around implant–abutment interfaces according to the platform‐switching concept. The midterm 3‐year follow‐up revealed pleasing esthetic outcomes and stable facial soft tissues. The risk of mucosal recession was low, with only one patient showing minor recession of the facial mucosa. These encouraging results need to be confirmed with a 5‐year follow‐up examination.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical outcome of submerged vs. non‐submerged implants placed in fresh extraction socketsClinical Oral Implants Research, 2009
- Aesthetic outcome of single‐tooth implant restorations following early implant placement and guided bone regeneration: crown and soft tissue dimensions compared with contralateral teethClinical Oral Implants Research, 2009
- Immediate Implant Placement Postextraction Without Flap ElevationJournal of Periodontology, 2009
- Early Implant Placement With Simultaneous Guided Bone Regeneration Following Single‐Tooth Extraction in the Esthetic Zone: A Cross‐Sectional, Retrospective Study in 45 Subjects With a 2‐ to 4‐Year Follow‐UpJournal of Periodontology, 2008
- Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placementsClinical Oral Implants Research, 2007
- A prospective clinical study of non‐submerged immediate implants: clinical outcomes and esthetic resultsClinical Oral Implants Research, 2007
- Immediate placement of implants in periapical infected sites: A prospective randomized study in 50 patientsOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology, 2006
- Bone healing and graft resorption of autograft, anorganic bovine bone and β‐tricalcium phosphate. A histologic and histomorphometric study in the mandibles of minipigsClinical Oral Implants Research, 2006
- A prospective clinical study of bone augmentation techniques at immediate implantsClinical Oral Implants Research, 2004
- Dimensions of Peri‐Implant Mucosa: An Evaluation of Maxillary Anterior Single Implants in HumansJournal of Periodontology, 2003