Utilization of Drivetime – Performing Non-Driving Related Tasks While Driving Highly Automated
Authors:
- 1 September 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
- Vol. 59 (1) , 1666-1670
Abstract
To utilize drivetime by engaging in non-driving related (secondary) tasks while driving highly automated is very likely to occur as soon as Level 3 (see NHTSA, 2013) automated vehicles enter the market. For this reason, it has to be investigated in advance whether different tasks are impeding drivers’ capabilities of regaining control in take-over situations and thereby compromising safety. For this purpose, studies regarding take-over in highly automated vehicles were reviewed and an experiment in a high fidelity driving simulator involving 24 participants was conducted, comparing four different types of non-driving related tasks. Results show differences in the dependent variables, dependent on criticality and complexity of the situation. Compared to drivers with visual and motoric tasks, take-over performance of drivers with a cognitive task was superior in well-practiced and noncomplex situations. Although the take-over situations of this study were well practiced and complexity and time criticality of the take-over situations were rather low, drivers reacted faster in manual mode than under the presence of the automated system. Furthermore, the participants reported engaging in those tasks as being rather dangerous and impeding their take-over performance and capability of reaction.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- How Traffic Situations and Non-Driving Related Tasks Affect the Take-Over Quality in Highly Automated DrivingProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2014
- Highly automated driving with a decoupled steering wheelProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2014
- Behavioural adaptation and effectiveness of a Forward Collision Warning System depending on a secondary cognitive taskTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2014
- “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2013
- Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditionsTransportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2013
- Control Task Substitution in Semiautomated DrivingHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2012
- The Effects of Cell Phone Use and Automation on Driver Performance and Subjective State in Simulated DrivingProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2012
- Highly Automated Driving, Secondary Task Performance, and Driver StateHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2012
- Impact of Incremental Increases in Cognitive Workload on Physiological Arousal and Performance in Young Adult DriversTransportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2009
- Human Error1990