Investigating Syntactic Complexity in EFL Learners' Writing across Common European Framework of Reference Levels A1, A2, and B1
- 11 January 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Applied Linguistics
- Vol. 41 (4) , 506-532
Abstract
The study investigates the linguistic basis of Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) levels in English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ writing. Specifically, it examines whether CEFR levels can be distinguished with reference to syntactic complexity (SC) and whether the results differ between two groups of EFL learners with different first languages (Sindhi and Finnish). This sheds light on the linguistic comparability of the CEFR levels across L1 groups. Informants were teenagers from Pakistan (N = 868) and Finland (N = 287) who wrote the same argumentative essay that was rated on a CEFR-based scale. The essays were analysed for 28 SC indices with the L2 Syntactic Complexity Analyzer and Coh-Metrix. Most indices were found to distinguish CEFR levels A1, A2, and B1 in both language groups: the clearest separators were the length of production units, subordination, and phrasal density indices. The learner groups differed most in the length measures and phrasal density when their CEFR level was controlled for. However, some indices remained the same, and the A1 level was more similar than A2 and B2 in terms of SC across the two groups.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Should We Use Characteristics of Conversation to Measure Grammatical Complexity in L2 Writing Development?TESOL Quarterly, 2011
- A Corpus‐Based Evaluation of Syntactic Complexity Measures as Indices of College‐Level ESL Writers' Language DevelopmentTESOL Quarterly, 2011
- Linguistic Features of Writing QualityWritten Communication, 2009
- Towards an Organic Approach to Investigating CAF in Instructed SLA: The Case of ComplexityApplied Linguistics, 2009
- Trends, issues and challenges in English language education in PakistanAsia Pacific Journal of Education, 2008
- The Shaky Ground Beneath the CEFR: Quantitative and Qualitative Dimensions of Language Proficiency1The Modern Language Journal, 2007
- The CEFR and the Need for More ResearchThe Modern Language Journal, 2007
- Syntactic Complexity Measures and their Relationship to L2 Proficiency: A Research Synthesis of College-level L2 WritingApplied Linguistics, 2003
- Examining Rater Errors in the Assessment of Written Composition With a Many‐Faceted Rasch ModelJournal of Educational Measurement, 1994
- Attainment of Syntactic and Morphological Accuracy by Advanced Language LearnersStudies in Second Language Acquisition, 1989