The Current and Retrospective Intentional Nature Exposure Scales: Development and Factorial Validity
Open Access
- 12 November 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 16 (22) , 4443
Abstract
Both nature exposure and green exercise (GE) can improve health. However, there are no scales examining frequency of engagement; or that consider interaction with nature. There are also no scales assessing these variables during childhood. The aim of this study was to develop a modified (NES-II) and retrospective (RNES-II) version of the Nature Exposure Scale to incorporate GE and to examine their factor structure and reliability. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) explored the factor structure of the scales; followed by confirmatory factor analysis to confirm the model fit. Fit indices for the one factor five item NES-II and RNES-II models identified by EFA were poor. Use of modification indices resulted in a good model fit; NES-II: χ(5, n = 385) = 2.638; χnormed = 0.879; CFI= 1.000; RMSEA < 0.001 with 90%CI = 0.000–0.082; SRMR = 0.009; AIC = 36.638. RNES-II: χ(2, n = 385) = 7.149; χnormed = 3.574; CFI = 0.995; RMSEA = 0.082 with 90%CI = 0.023–0.151; SRMR = 0.015; AIC = 43.149. Both models demonstrated very good reliability (α = 0.84; 89 respectively). These findings indicate that the scales can be used to assess current and retrospective nature exposure. However, due to the removal of item one, the authors recommend that the scales be named the ‘intentional nature exposure scale’ and ‘retrospective intentional nature exposure scale’.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Viewing Nature Scenes Positively Affects Recovery of Autonomic Function Following Acute-Mental StressEnvironmental Science & Technology, 2013
- The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental healthAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2012
- What is the Best Dose of Nature and Green Exercise for Improving Mental Health? A Multi-Study AnalysisEnvironmental Science & Technology, 2010
- Why Is Nature Beneficial?Environment and Behavior, 2008
- The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validationHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2007
- The mental and physical health outcomes of green exerciseInternational Journal of Environmental Health Research, 2005
- The short‐form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS‐21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non‐clinical sampleBritish Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2005
- Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settingsJournal of Environmental Psychology, 2003
- Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999
- "How Big Is Big Enough?": Sample Size and Goodness of Fit in Structural Equation Models with Latent VariablesChild Development, 1987