Effects of Two Guideline Implementation Strategies on Patient Outcomes in Primary Care
Authors:
- Annette BeckerAnnette Becker
- Corinna LeonhardtCLCorinna Leonhardt
- Michael M. KochenMKMichael M. Kochen
- Stefan KellerSKStefan Keller
- Karl WegscheiderKWKarl Wegscheider
- Erika BaumEBErika Baum
- Norbert Donner-BanzhoffNDNorbert Donner-Banzhoff
- Michael PfingstenMPMichael Pfingsten
- Jan HildebrandtJHJan Hildebrandt
- Heinz-Dieter BaslerHBHeinz-Dieter Basler
- Jean F. ChenotJean F. Chenot
- 1 March 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 33 (5) , 473-480
Abstract
Cluster randomized controlled trial. To improve quality of care for patients with low back pain (LBP) a multifaceted general practitioner education alone and in combination with motivational counseling by practice nurses has been implemented in German general practices. We studied effects on functional capacity (main outcome), days in pain, physical activity, quality of life, or days of sick leave (secondary outcomes) compared with no intervention. International research has lead to the development of the German LBP guideline for general practitioners. However, there is still doubt about the most effective implementation strategy. Although effects on process of care have been observed frequently, changes in patient outcomes are rarely seen. We recruited 1378 patients with LBP in 118 general practices, which were randomized to 1 of 3 study arms: a multifaceted guideline implementation (GI), GI plus training of practice nurses in motivational counseling (MC), and the postal dissemination of the guideline (controls, C). Data were collected (questionnaires and patient interviews) at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. Multilevel mixed effects modeling was used to adjust for clustering of data and potential confounders. After 6 months, functional capacity was higher in the intervention groups with a cluster adjusted mean difference of 3.650 between the MC group and controls (95% CI = 0.320–6.979, P = 0.032) and 2.652 between the GI group and controls (95% CI = −0.704 to 6.007, P = 0.120). Intervention effects were more pronounced regarding days in pain per year with an average reduction of 16 (GI) to 17 days (MC) after 6 months (12 and 9 days after 12 months) compared with controls. Active implementation of the German LBP guideline results in slightly better outcomes during 6 months follow-up than its postal dissemination. Results are more distinct when practice nurses are trained in motivational counseling.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Managing low back pain presenting to primary care: Where do we go from here?Pain, 2006
- Social SupportCancer Nursing, 2006
- Stage-based lifestyle interventions in primary careAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2004
- Angstvermeidungs- berzeugungen bei R ckenschmerzenDer Schmerz, 2004
- The efficacy of motivational interviewing: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2003
- Psychosocial Predictors of Changes in Physical Activity in Overweight Sedentary Adults Following Counseling in Primary CarePreventive Medicine, 2000
- Die deutsche Version des EuroQol-FragebogensJournal of Public Health, 1998
- A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disabilityPain, 1993
- Grading the severity of chronic painPain, 1992
- Evaluation of a Physician Education Intervention to Improve Primary Care for Low-Back Pain IISpine, 1991