Cost-Effectiveness of the First Line Treatment Options For Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in India
Open Access
- 1 February 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in JCO Global Oncology
- Vol. 9 (9) , e2200246
Abstract
PURPOSE: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as sunitinib and pazopanib are the mainstay of treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in India. However, pembrolizumab and nivolumab have shown significant improvement in the median progression-free survival and overall survival among patients with mRCC. In this study, we aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of the first-line treatment options for the patients with mRCC in India. METHODS: A Markov state-transition model was used to measure the lifetime costs and health outcomes associated with sunitinib, pazopanib, pembrolizumab/lenvatinib, and nivolumab/ipilimumab among patients with first-line mRCC. Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained with a given treatment option was compared against the next best alternative and assessed for cost-effectiveness using a willingness to pay threshold of one-time per capita gross-domestic product of India. The parameter uncertainty was analyzed using the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: We estimated the total lifetime cost per patient of ₹ 0.27 million ($3,706 US dollars [USD]), ₹ 0.35 million ($4,716 USD), ₹ 9.7 million ($131,858 USD), and ₹ 6.7 million ($90,481 USD) for the sunitinib, pazopanib, pembrolizumab/lenvatinib, and nivolumab/ipilimumab arms, respectively. Similarly, the mean QALYs lived per patient were 1.91, 1.86, 2.75, and 1.97, respectively. Sunitinib incurs an average cost of ₹ 143,269 ($1,939 USD) per QALY lived. Therefore, sunitinib at current reimbursement rates (₹ 10,000 per cycle) has a 94.6% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness to pay threshold of 1-time per capita gross-domestic product (₹ 168,300) in the Indian context. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the current inclusion of sunitinib under India's publicly financed health insurance scheme.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cost-Effectiveness of Pazopanib Compared with Sunitinib in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in CanadaCurrent Oncology, 2016
- Clinical characteristics of renal cell carcinoma: Five years review from a tertiary hospital in Eastern IndiaIndian Journal of Cancer, 2016
- Current evidence and the evolving role of sunitinib in the management of renal cell carcinomaIndian Journal of Cancer, 2016
- Cost-Effectiveness of Pazopanib Versus Sunitinib for Renal Cancer in the United StatesJournal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy, 2015
- Pazopanib versus Sunitinib in Metastatic Renal-Cell CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task ForceValue in Health, 2013
- Sunitinib in metastatic renal cell carcimoma: A single-center experienceIndian Journal of Cancer, 2013
- Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curvesBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2012
- The Epidemiology of Renal Cell CarcinomaEuropean Urology, 2011
- Sunitinib in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell CarcinomaJAMA, 2006