Favorable response to second-line sirolimus regardless of STAT3/5b status in acquired pure red cell aplasia: A retrospective study from a single center
Open Access
- 24 August 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Therapeutic Advances in Hematology
- Vol. 17
Abstract
Background: Cyclosporine A (CsA) is the standard first-line treatment for acquired pure red cell aplasia (PRCA), but outcomes vary. Effective salvage strategies for CsA-refractory patients, particularly those with complex secondary subtypes, remain inadequately defined. Additionally, the clinical utility of STAT3/5b mutations in guiding treatment selection remains unclear. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of second-line sirolimus for the treatment of PRCA and explore the possible genetic predictors for the response. Design: This study was a retrospective, single center, comparative study. Methods: Patients with acquired PRCA treated between 2021 and 2025, including 36 patients who received first-line CsA and 22 patients who switched to sirolimus due to lack of response or intolerance. Clinical outcomes, including overall response rate (ORR) and time to response (TTR), were compared between primary and secondary PRCA. STAT3/5b mutation status was also analyzed to assess its predictive value for treatment response. Results: The ORR for first-line CsA was 25.0% (9/36), with significantly higher efficacy observed in primary cases (42.1%, 8/19) than in secondary cases (5.9%, 1/17; p = 0.015). In the salvage sirolimus group, the ORR was 54.5%, demonstrating efficacy in both primary (37.5%, 3/8) and secondary cases (64.3%, 9/14). The median TTR did not differ significantly between sirolimus and CsA (3.0 vs. 1.5 months, p = 0.150), and both agents achieved sustained remission in responders. Regarding genetic predictors, no responses to CsA were observed in patients harboring STAT3/5b mutations (0/6). In contrast, sirolimus elicited responses in both mutated (3/6) and wild-type (4/5) patients, indicating efficacy irrespective of STAT3/5b status. Conclusions: CsA is effective in primary PRCA, whereas sirolimus demonstrates efficacy in both primary and secondary cases regardless of STAT3/5b status. Early genetic profiling may facilitate the identification of patients who may not fully response to CsA and potentially earlier transition to sirolimus salvage therapy.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2025YFC3511400)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (82174138)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (82304937)
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical features and outcomes in large granular lymphocyte leukemia − associated pure red cell aplasia with STAT3 mutationAnnals of Hematology, 2025
- Efficacy and influencing factors of immunosuppressive therapy for pure red cell aplasia: meta-analysis and systematic reviewAnnals of Hematology, 2025
- Molecular landscape of CD8+ T cells in pure red cell aplasiaAnnals of Hematology, 2025
- Cyclosporine: Immunosuppressive effects, entwined toxicity, and clinical modulations of an organ transplant drugTransplant Immunology, 2024
- STAT3 protects hematopoietic stem cells by preventing activation of a deleterious autocrine type-I interferon responseLeukemia, 2024
- Sirolimus versus cyclosporine A in patients with primary acquired pure red cell aplasia: a prospective cohort studyBlood Cancer Journal, 2023
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes of 100 adult patients with pure red cell aplasiaAnnals of Hematology, 2022
- Sirolimus is effective for refractory/relapsed/intolerant acquired pure red cell aplasia: results of a prospective single-institutional trialLeukemia, 2022
- Management of thymoma associated autoimmune pure red cell aplasia: Case report and systematic review of the literatureLung Cancer, 2021
- The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studiesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2008