Adjacent-Level Range of Motion and Intradiscal Pressure After Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fixation
Authors:
- Ryan M. KretzerRKRyan M. Kretzer
- Wesley HsuWHWesley Hsu
- Nianbin HuNHNianbin Hu
- Hidemasa UmekojiHUHidemasa Umekoji
- George I. JalloGJGeorge I. Jallo
- Paul C. McAfeePMPaul C. McAfee
- P. Justin TortolaniPTP. Justin Tortolani
- Bryan W. CunninghamBCBryan W. Cunningham
- 1 June 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 37 (13) , E778-E785
Abstract
This in vitro human cadaveric study measured adjacent-level kinematics after posterior cervical decompression and fixation. Quantify adjacent-level changes in range of motion (ROM) and intradiscal pressure after posterior cervical decompression and fixation. Optimal length of instrumentation after posterior decompression is unclear. Longer posterior cervical fixation constructs may increase the risk of adjacent-segment degeneration. Eight cervicothoracic spines were evaluated intact, with C3–C6 laminectomy, C3–C6 laminectomy + C3–C6 fixation, C3–C6 laminectomy + C3–C7 fixation, C3–C7 laminectomy, C3–C7 laminectomy + C3–C7 fixation, C3–C7 laminectomy + C2–C7 fixation, C3–C7 laminectomy + C3–T2 fixation, and C3–C7 laminectomy + C2–T2 fixation. Testing included intact moments (±2.0 N·m) in flexion/extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending, with quantification of ROM at C2–C3, C6–C7, and C7–T1 normalized to the intact spine. Intradiscal pressures were also measured at each level. For the C3–C6 laminectomy group, there were no differences in adjacent-level flexion/extension ROM or intradiscal pressure based on construct length, except at C6–C7, where ROM was significantly decreased when fixation was extended to C7 (P < 0.05). After C3–C7 laminectomy and reconstruction, the greatest increase in C2–C3 flexion/extension ROM and intradiscal pressure occurred in the C3–T2 fixation subgroup (ROM: 348% [P < 0.05]; intradiscal pressure: 319 ± 243 psi [pounds per square inch] vs. 65 ± 41 psi intact [P < 0.05]). At C7–T1, the greatest increase in flexion/extension ROM and intradiscal pressure occurred after C2–C7 fixation (ROM: 531% [P < 0.05]; intradiscal pressure: 152 ± 83 psi vs. 21 ± 14 psi intact [P < 0.05]). For C3–C6 laminectomy, instrumentation to C7 significantly decreased flexion/extension ROM and intradiscal pressure at C6–C7 without significantly increasing either measure at C2–C3 or C7–T1 relative to C3–C6 fixation. In the setting of a C3–C7 laminectomy, when instrumenting to either C2 or T2, consideration should be given to including both levels within these constructs.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stabilizing Potential of Anterior, Posterior, and Circumferential Fixation for Multilevel Cervical ArthrodesisSpine, 2007
- Surgical management of cervical myelopathy dealing with the cervical–thoracic junctionThe Spine Journal, 2006
- Surgical management of cervical myelopathy: indications and techniques for laminectomy and fusionThe Spine Journal, 2006
- Regional instability following cervicothoracic junction surgeryJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 2006
- Posterior cervical decompression and fusion for circumferential spondylotic cervical stenosis: Review of 50 consecutive casesJournal of Clinical Neuroscience, 2006
- Biomechanical Evaluation of Posterior Screw Fixation in Cadaveric Cervical SpinesClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2003
- Laminectomy for cervical myelopathySpinal Cord, 2003
- Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myeloradiculopathy With Posterior Decompression and Fusion With Lateral Mass Plate Fixation and Local Bone GraftJournal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 2003
- Characteristics of Unicortical and Bicortical Lateral Mass Screws in the Cervical SpineSpine, 1999
- Biomechanical Evaluation of Posterior Cervical Stabilization After a Wide LaminectomySpine, 1997