Managing Anger and Annoyance in Organizations in China
Authors:
- 1 June 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Group & Organization Management
- Vol. 32 (3) , 260-289
Abstract
Results from critical incidents, developed through diaries of organizational members in China, support the social cognitive perspective's emphasis on the role of cognitions in the experience and response to anger and suggest that this perspective is a potential foundation for managing anger. Findings indicate that the open-minded discussion (constructive controversy) of the anger and annoyance incidents confirms social face and strengthens relationships. These productive dynamics and outcomes were found to occur when organizational members felt cooperatively interdependent. Results were interpreted as suggesting that even in a society where collectivist and conflict-negative values are influential, anger and annoyance can be constructively managed through an open-minded discussion of the incident.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Emotions in collectivist and individualist contexts.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001
- The terrible twos—anger and anxiety: Hazardous to your health.American Psychologist, 2001
- Anger in the workplace: an emotion script approach to anger episodes between workers and their superiors, co-workers and subordinatesJournal of Organizational Behavior, 2000
- Anger expression in Mexican American and White non-Hispanic adolescents.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1999
- Cooperative and Competitive Goal Approach to Conflict: Accomplishments and ChallengesApplied Psychology, 1998
- Interdependence and Controversy in Group Decision Making: Antecedents to Effective Self-Managing TeamsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998
- The Influence of Anger and Compassion on Negotiation PerformanceOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1997
- Unfairness, Anger, and Spite: Emotional Rejections of Ultimatum OffersOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986
- Studies of interpersonal bargainingJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1962