In vitro validation of flow measurement with phase contrast MRI at 3 tesla using stereoscopic particle image velocimetry and stereoscopic particle image velocimetry-based computational fluid dynamics
Authors:
- 7 October 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Vol. 39 (6) , 1477-1485
Abstract
Purpose To validate conventional phase‐contrast MRI (PC‐MRI) measurements of steady and pulsatile flows through stenotic phantoms with various degrees of narrowing at Reynolds numbers mimicking flows in the human iliac artery using stereoscopic particle image velocimetry (SPIV) as gold standard. Materials and Methods A series of detailed experiments are reported for validation of MR measurements of steady and pulsatile flows with SPIV and CFD on three different stenotic models with 50%, 74%, and 87% area occlusions at three sites: two diameters proximal to the stenosis, at the throat, and two diameters distal to the stenosis. Results Agreement between conventional spin‐warp PC‐MRI with Cartesian read‐out and SPIV was demonstrated for both steady and pulsatile flows with mean Reynolds numbers of 130, 160, and 190 at the inlet by evaluating the linear regression between the two methods. The analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of > 0.99 and > 0.96 for steady and pulsatile flows, respectively. Additionally, it was found that the most accurate measures of flow by the sequence were at the throat of the stenosis (error < 5% for both steady and pulsatile mean flows). The flow rate error distal to the stenosis was primarily found to be a function of narrowing severity including dependence on proper Venc selection. Conclusion SPIV and CFD provide excellent approaches to in vitro validation of new or existing PC‐MRI flow measurement techniques. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;39:1477–1485.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Three‐dimensional analysis of segmental wall shear stress in the aorta by flow‐sensitive four‐dimensional‐MRIJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2009
- Steady inlet flow in stenotic geometries: convective and absolute instabilitiesJournal of Fluid Mechanics, 2008
- MRI phase contrast velocity and flow errors in turbulent stenotic jetsJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2008
- Comparison of Particle Image Velocimetry and Phase Contrast MRI in a Patient-Specific Extracardiac Total Cavopulmonary ConnectionJournal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2008
- Laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV) and 3D phase‐contrast magnetic resonance angiography (PC‐MRA) velocity measurements: Validation in an anatomically accurate cerebral artery aneurysm model with steady flowJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2007
- Factors affecting the accuracy of pressure measurements in vascular stenoses from phase‐contrast MRIMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2004
- Cardiovascular applications of magnetic resonance flow and velocity measurementsJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1996
- A comparative study of velocity measurements in major blood vessels using magnetic resonance imaging and Doppler ultrasoundBritish Journal of Radiology, 1993
- Computer-controlled flow simulator for MR flow studiesJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1992
- Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Velocimetry for Steady FlowJournal of Biomechanical Engineering, 1990