Effect of Lower-Body Resistance Training on Upper-Body Strength Adaptation in Trained Men
- 1 January 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
- Vol. 32 (1) , 13-18
Abstract
Bartolomei, S, Hoffman, JR, Stout, JR, and Merni, F. Effect of lower-body resistance training on upper-body strength adaptation in trained men. J Strength Cond Res 32(1): 13–18, 2018—The aim of this study was to examine the effect of 2 different lower-body strength training schemes on upper-body adaptations to resistance training. Twenty resistance-trained men (4.25 ± 1.6 years of experience) were randomly assigned to either a high intensity (HI; n = 9; age = 24.9 ± 2.9 years; body mass = 88.7 ± 17.2 kg; height = 177.0 ± 5.6 cm) or a mixed high volume and HI resistance training program (MP; n = 11; age = 26.0 ± 4.7 years; body mass = 82.8 ± 9.1 kg; height = 177.54 ± 5.9 cm). High-intensity group followed a HI training for both upper and lower body (4–5 reps at 88%–90% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM)), whereas the MP group performed high-volume training sessions focused on muscle hypertrophy for lower body (10–12 reps at 65%–70% of 1-RM) and a HI protocol for the upper body. Maximal strength and power testing occurred before and after the 6-week training program. Analysis of covariance was used to compare performance measures between the groups. Greater increases in MP groups compared with HI groups were observed for bench press 1RM (p = 0.007), bench press power at 50% of 1RM (p = 0.011), and for arm muscle area (p = 0.046). Significant difference between the 2 groups at posttest were also observed for fat mass (p = 0.009). Results indicated that training programs focused on lower-body muscle hypertrophy and maximal strength for upper body can stimulate greater strength and power gains in the upper body compared with HI resistance training programs for both the upper and lower body.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intramuscular anabolic signaling and endocrine response following high volume and high intensity resistance exercise protocols in trained menPhysiological Reports, 2015
- A Comparison of Methods for Determining the Rate of Force Development During Isometric Midthigh Clean PullsJournal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2015
- A Comparison of Traditional and Block Periodized Strength Training Programs in Trained AthletesJournal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2014
- Unilateral arm strength training improves contralateral peak force and rate of force developmentEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 2008
- Contralateral effects of unilateral strength training: evidence and possible mechanismsJournal of Applied Physiology, 2006
- Neural Adaptations to Resistive ExerciseSports Medicine, 2006
- Neural Adaptations to Resistance TrainingSports Medicine, 2001
- Neural inhibition during maximal eccentric and concentric quadriceps contraction: effects of resistance trainingJournal of Applied Physiology, 2000
- Hormonal Responses of Multiset Versus Single-Set Heavy-Resistance Exercise ProtocolsCanadian Journal of Applied Physiology, 1997
- Effects of velocity of isokinetic training on strength, power, and quadriceps muscle fibre characteristicsEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 1990