The influence of symbiotic bacteria on reproductive strategies and wing polyphenism in pea aphids responding to stress
- 10 January 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Animal Ecology
- Vol. 88 (4) , 601-611
Abstract
Environmental stressors can be key drivers of phenotypes, including reproductive strategies and morphological traits. The response to stress may be altered by the presence of microbial associates. For example, in aphids, facultative (secondary) bacterial symbionts can provide protection against natural enemies and stress induced by elevated temperatures. Furthermore, aphids exhibit phenotypic plasticity, producing winged (rather than wingless) progeny that may be better able to escape danger, and the combination of these factors improves the response to stress. How symbionts and phenotypic plasticity, both of which shape aphids’ stress response, influence one another, and together influence host fitness, remains unclear. In this study, we investigate how environmental stressors drive shifts in fecundity and winged/wingless offspring production, and how secondary symbionts influence the process. We induced production of winged offspring through distinct environmental stressors, including exposure to aphid alarm pheromone and crowding, and, in one experiment, we assessed whether the aphid response is influenced by host plant. In the winged morph, energy needed for wing maintenance may lead to trade‐offs with other traits, such as reproduction or symbiont maintenance. Potential trade‐offs between symbiont maintenance and fitness have been proposed but have not been tested. Thus, beyond studying the production of offspring of alternative morphs, we also explore the influence of symbionts across wing/wingless polyphenism as well as symbiont interaction with cross‐generational impacts of environmental stress on reproductive output. All environmental stressors resulted in increased production of winged offspring and shifts in fecundity rates. Additionally, in some cases, aphid host‐by‐symbiont interactions influenced fecundity. Stress on first‐generation aphids had cross‐generational impacts on second‐generation adults, and the impact on fecundity was further influenced by the presence of secondary symbionts and presence/absence of wings. Our study suggests a complex interaction between beneficial symbionts and environmental stressors. Winged aphids have the advantage of being able to migrate out of danger with more ease, but energy needed for wing production and maintenance may come with reproductive costs for their mothers and for themselves, where in certain cases, these costs are altered by secondary symbionts.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Science Foundation (DBI1306387, IOS‐1025853)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (5K12‐GM000680‐17)
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Symbiont-Mediated Protection against Fungal Pathogens in Pea Aphids: a Role for Pathogen Specificity?Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2013
- Genomic basis of endosymbiont-conferred protection against an insect parasitoidGenome Research, 2011
- Rapid Spread of a Bacterial Symbiont in an Invasive Whitefly Is Driven by Fitness Benefits and Female BiasScience, 2011
- Interspecific symbiont transfection confers a novel ecological trait to the recipient insectBiology Letters, 2010
- Effects of bacterial secondary symbionts on host plant use in pea aphidsProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2010
- Aphid wing dimorphisms: linking environmental and genetic control of trait variationPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2010
- Aphid reproductive investment in response to mortality risksBMC Ecology and Evolution, 2010
- A strain of the bacterial symbiont Regiella insecticola protects aphids against parasitoidsBiology Letters, 2009
- Symbiont modifies host life-history traits that affect gene flowProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2006
- Robustness trade‐offs and host–microbial symbiosis in the immune systemMolecular Systems Biology, 2006