Point/counterpoint: randomized versus single-arm phase II clinical trials for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma
Open Access
- 5 April 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Neuro-Oncology
- Vol. 19 (4) , 469-474
Abstract
In this article, we attempt to delineate the pros and cons of single-arm versus randomized phase II studies in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM), taking into account such factors as (i) the availability of appropriate controls, (ii) the interpretability of the resulting data, (iii) the goal of rapidly screening many novel agents using as few patients as necessary, (iv) utilization of limited financial and patient resources, and (v) maximization of patient participation in these studies.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Greater chemotherapy-induced lymphopenia enhances tumor-specific immune responses that eliminate EGFRvIII-expressing tumor cells in patients with glioblastomaNeuro-Oncology, 2010
- Immunologic Escape After Prolonged Progression-Free Survival With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Variant III Peptide Vaccination in Patients With Newly Diagnosed GlioblastomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Analysis of the Yield of Phase II Combination Therapy Trials in Medical OncologyClinical Cancer Research, 2010
- Survival of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Treated with Radiation and Temozolomide in Research Studies in the United StatesClinical Cancer Research, 2010
- Comparison of Error Rates in Single-Arm Versus Randomized Phase II Cancer Clinical TrialsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- The Design of Phase II Clinical Trials Testing Cancer Therapeutics: Consensus Recommendations from the Clinical Trial Design Task Force of the National Cancer Institute Investigational Drug Steering CommitteeClinical Cancer Research, 2010
- A Comparison of Phase II Study StrategiesClinical Cancer Research, 2009
- Radiotherapy plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for GlioblastomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1989
- An Adaptive Procedure for Sequential Clinical TrialsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1969