Relational coordination promotes quality of chronic care delivery in Dutch disease-management programs
- 1 January 2012
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Health Care Management Review
- Vol. 37 (4) , 301-309
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that relational coordination is positively associated with the delivery of hospital care, acute care, emergency care, trauma care, and nursing home care. The effect of relational coordination in primary care settings, such as disease-management programs, remains unknown. This study examined relational coordination between general practitioners and other professionals in disease-management programs and assessed the impact of relational coordination on the delivery of chronic illness care. Professionals (n = 188; response rate = 57%) in 19 disease-management programs located throughout the Netherlands completed surveys that assessed relational coordination and chronic care delivery. We used a cross-sectional study design. Our study demonstrated that the delivery of chronic illness care was positively related to relational coordination. We found positive relationships with community linkages (r = .210, p < .01), self-management support (r = .217, p < .01), decision support (r = .190, p < .01), delivery system design (r = .278, p < .001), and clinical information systems (r = .193, p < .01). Organization of the health delivery system was not significantly related to relational coordination. The regression analyses showed that even after controlling for all background variables, relational coordination still significantly affected chronic care delivery (β = .212, p ≤ .01). As expected, our findings showed a lower degree of relational coordination among general practitioners than between general practitioners and other core disease-management team members: practice nurses (M = 2.69 vs. 3.73; p < .001), dieticians (M = 2.69 vs. 3.07; p < .01), physical therapists (M = 2.69 vs. 3.06; p < .01), medical specialists (M = 2.69 vs. 3.16; p < .01), and nurse practitioners (M = 2.69 vs. 3.19; p < .001). The enhancement of relational coordination among core disease-management professionals with different disciplines is expected to improve chronic illness care delivery.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development and validation of a short version of the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) in Dutch Disease Management ProgramsHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2011
- Impact of relational coordination on job satisfaction and quality outcomes: a study of nursing homesHuman Resource Management Journal, 2008
- Coordinating Mechanisms in Care Provider Groups: Relational Coordination as a Mediator and Input Uncertainty as a Moderator of Performance EffectsManagement Science, 2002
- Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC): A Practical Tool to Measure Quality ImprovementHealth Services Research, 2002
- Relationships between Service Providers and Their Impact on CustomersJournal of Service Research, 2002
- Supervisory Span, Relational Coordination and Flight Departure Performance: A Reassessment of Postbureaucracy TheoryOrganization Science, 2001
- Care-as-Service, Care-as-Relating, Care-as-ComfortThe Gerontologist, 2001
- Beyond ‘unloving care’: linking human resource management and patient care quality in nursing homesThe International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2000
- Organizing work to support relational co-ordinationThe International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2000
- Questionnaire Colour and Mail Survey Response RateMarket Research Society Journal, 1997