Hospital esophagectomy volume and postoperative length of stay: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:

• Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010
  The Lancet, 2012
• Variation in Esophagectomy Outcomes in Hospitals Meeting Leapfrog Volume Outcome Standards
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2011
• Kaizen Method for Esophagectomy Patients: Improved Quality Control, Outcomes, and Decreased Costs
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2011
• A Critical Evaluation of the Impact of Leapfrog’s Evidence-Based Hospital Referral
  Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2011
• Effects of hospital and surgeon case-volumes on postoperative complications and length of stay after esophagectomy in Japan
  Surgery Today, 2009
• Centralization of Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Does It Improve Clinical Outcome?
  Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2009
• Comparing methodologies for the cost estimation of hospital services
  The European Journal of Health Economics, 2008
• High-Volume versus Low-Volume for Esophageal Resections for Cancer: The Essential Role of Case-Mix Adjustments based on Clinical Data
  Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2007
• Oesophagectomy practice and outcomes in England
  British Journal of Surgery, 2007
• Randomized clinical trial comparing 5-year recurrence rate after laparoscopic versus Shouldice repair of primary inguinal hernia
  British Journal of Surgery, 2005