Household energy and recycling of nutrients and carbon to the soil in integrated crop‐livestock farming systems: a case study in Kumbursa village, Central Highlands of Ethiopia
Authors:
Open Access
- 28 June 2017
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in GCB Bioenergy
- Vol. 9 (10) , 1588-1601
Abstract
Soil amendment with organic wastes in the Highlands of Ethiopia has been greatly reduced by widespread use of dung cakes and crop residues as fuels. This study assessed the interaction between household energy and recycling of nutrients and carbon to the soil using household survey, focus group discussions, key informant interviews, direct observations and measurements between 2014 and 2015 in Kumbursa village (Central Highlands of Ethiopia). All surveyed households were entirely dependent on biomass fuel for cooking, with production and consumption rates directly related to wealth status, which significantly varied (P < 0.001) among three farm wealth groups (poor, medium and rich). Crop residues and dung cakes accounted for 80(±3)% by energy content and 85(±4)% by dry mass weight of total biomass fuel consumption. Mean losses were 59(±2) kg ha−1 yr−1nitrogen (109(±8) kg yr−1per household), 13.9(±0.3) kg ha−1 yr−1phosphorus (26(±2) kg yr−1per household), 79(±2) kg ha−1 yr−1potassium (150(±11) kg yr−1per household) and 2100(±40) kg ha−1 yr−1organic carbon (3000(±300) kg yr−1per household). Rich farmers lost significantly more carbon and nutrients in fuel than farmers in other wealth groups. However, these losses were spread over a larger area, so losses per land area were significantly higher for medium and poor than for rich farmers. This means that the land of poorer farmers is likely to become degraded more rapidly due to fuel limitations than that of rich farmers, so increasing the poverty gap. The estimated financial loss per household due to not using dung and crop residues as organic fertilizer was 162(±8) US$ yr−1. However, this is less than their value as fuels, which was 490(±20) US$ yr−1. Therefore, farmers will only be persuaded to use these valuable assets as soil improvers if an alternative, cheaper fuel source can be found.Keywords
Funding Information
- Addis Ababa University
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The environmental benefits of domestic biogas technology in rural EthiopiaBiomass and Bioenergy, 2016
- Agricultural waste utilisation strategies and demand for urban waste compost: Evidence from smallholder farmers in EthiopiaWaste Management, 2015
- Enhancing Biomass Energy Efficiency in Rural Households of EthiopiaJournal of Energy and Natural Resources, 2015
- What is the potential for biogas digesters to improve soil fertility and crop production in Sub-Saharan Africa?Biomass and Bioenergy, 2014
- Potential for Pathogen reduction in anaerobic digestion and biogas generation in Sub-Saharan AfricaBiomass and Bioenergy, 2014
- Commentary: Switching to biogas – What effect could it have on indoor air quality and human health?Biomass and Bioenergy, 2014
- Fuelwood Savings and Carbon Emission Reductions by the Use of Improved Cooking Stoves in an Afromontane Forest, EthiopiaLand, 2014
- Efficiency of Neyman Allocation Procedure over other Allocation Procedures in Stratified Random SamplingAmerican Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 2013
- Household energy economics in rural Ethiopia: A cost-benefit analysis of biogas energyRenewable Energy, 2012
- From Linear Fuel Switching to Multiple Cooking Strategies: A Critique and Alternative to the Energy Ladder ModelWorld Development, 2000