Enhanced Training in Vascular Access Creation Predicts Arteriovenous Fistula Placement and Patency in Hemodialysis Patients
Authors:
- Rajiv SaranRSRajiv Saran
- Stacey J. ElderSEStacey J. Elder
- David A. GoodkinDGDavid A. Goodkin
- Takashi AkibaTATakashi Akiba
- Jean EthierJEJean Ethier
- Hugh C. RaynerHRHugh C. Rayner
- Akira SaitoASAkira Saito
- Eric W. YoungEYEric W. Young
- Brenda W. GillespieBGBrenda W. Gillespie
- Robert M. MerionRMRobert M. Merion
- Ronald L. PisoniRPRonald L. Pisoni
- 1 May 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 247 (5) , 885-891
Abstract
To investigate whether intensity of surgical training influences type of vascular access placed and fistula survival. Wide variations in fistula placement and survival occur internationally. Underlying explanations are not well understood. Prospective data from 12 countries in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study were analyzed; outcomes of interest were type of vascular access in use (fistula vs. graft) in hemodialysis patients at study entry and time from placement until primary and secondary access failures, as predicted by surgical training. Logistic and Cox regression models were adjusted for patient characteristics and time on hemodialysis. During training, US surgeons created fewer fistulae (US mean = 16 vs. 39–426 in other countries) and noted less emphasis on vascular access placement compared with surgeons elsewhere. Significant predictors of fistula versus graft placement in hemodialysis patients included number of fistulae placed during training (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.2 for fistula placement, per 2 times greater number of fistulae placed during training, P < 0.0001) and degree of emphasis on vascular access creation during training (AOR = 2.4 for fistula placement, for much-to-extreme emphasis vs. no emphasis, P = 0.0008). Risk of primary fistula failure was 34% lower (relative risk = 0.66, P = 0.002) when placed by surgeons who created ≥25 (vs. <25) fistulae during training. Surgical training is key to both fistula placement and survival, yet US surgical programs seem to place less emphasis on fistula creation than those in other countries. Enhancing surgical training in fistula creation would help meet targets of the Fistula First Initiative.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- The operating surgeon is the major determinant for a successful arteriovenous fistula maturationKidney International, 2007
- Why don't fistulas mature?Kidney International, 2006
- Improving Outcomes for Dialysis Patients in the International Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns StudyClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2006
- The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS): Design, data elements, and methodologyAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2004
- Timing of first cannulation and vascular access failure in haemodialysis: an analysis of practice patterns at dialysis facilities in the DOPPSNephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2004
- Increasing arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients: Problems and solutionsKidney International, 2002
- Vascular access use in Europe and the United States: Results from the DOPPSKidney International, 2002
- Type of vascular access and mortality in U.S. hemodialysis patientsKidney International, 2001
- A prospective study of vascular access infections at seven outpatient hemodialysis centersAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2001
- The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS): An international hemodialysis studyKidney International, 2000