Is direct measurement of time possible?
Open Access
- 18 August 2017
- conference paper
- Published by IOP Publishing in Journal of Physics: Conference Series
- Vol. 880 (1) , 012066
Abstract
Is direct measurement of time possible? The answer to this question may depend upon how one understands time. Is time an essential constituent of physical reality? Or is what scientists are talking about when they use the symbol 't' or the word 'time' an human cultural construct, as the Chief of the USA NIST Divisions of Time and Frequency and of Quantum Physics has suggested. Few aspects of physics do not reference activity to time, but many discussions within either view of time seem to use one same, largely traditional, language of time. Briefly considering the question of measurement, including from a formal measure-theoretic point of view, clarifies the situation.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Attosecond chronoscopy of photoemissionReviews of Modern Physics, 2015
- Spacetime representation of electromagnetic radiation in a (2+1)-dimensional universeJournal of Physics: Conference Series, 2015
- Direct Imaging of Covalent Bond Structure in Single-Molecule Chemical ReactionsScience, 2013
- The evolution of time measurement, Part 4: the atomic second [Recalibration]IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, 2012
- Standards of Time and Frequency at the Outset of the 21st CenturyScience, 2004
- Time and frequency measurement at NIST: the first 100 years2002
- Time in quantum gravity: An hypothesisPhysical Review D, 1991
- The Role of Music in Galileo's ExperimentsScientific American, 1975
- Foundational aspects of theories of measurementThe Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1958
- A Direct Photoelectric Determination of Planck's ""Physical Review B, 1916