Why Do Only Some Events Cause Learning During Human Tutoring?
Authors:
- Kurt VanLehnKVKurt VanLehn
- Stephanie SilerSSStephanie Siler
- Charles MurrayCMCharles Murray
- Takashi YamauchiTYTakashi Yamauchi
- William B. BaggettWBWilliam B. Baggett
- 1 September 2003
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Cognition and Instruction
- Vol. 21 (3) , 209-249
Abstract
Developers of intelligent tutoring systems would like to know what human tutors do and which activities are responsible for their success in tutoring. We address these questions by comparing episodes where tutoring does and does not cause learning. Approximately 125 hr of tutorial dialog between expert human tutors and physics students are analyzed to see what features of the dialog are associated with learning. Successful learning appears to require that the student reach an impasse. When students were not at an impasse, learning was uncommon regardless of the tutorial explanations employed. On the other hand, once students were at an impasse, tutorial explanations were sometimes associated with learning. Moreover, for different types of knowledge, different types of tutorial explanations were associated with learning different types of knowledge.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Constructing Self-Explanations and Scaffolded Explanations in TutoringApplied Cognitive Psychology, 1996
- Cognitive Tutors: Lessons LearnedJournal of the Learning Sciences, 1995
- Improving examples to improve transfer to novel problemsMemory & Cognition, 1994
- Skill acquisition and the LISP tutorCognitive Science, 1989
- Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problemsCognitive Science, 1989
- Preschool children can learn to transfer: Learning to learn and learning from exampleCognitive Psychology, 1988
- Prompting, feedback and error correction in the design of a scenario machineInternational Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1988
- Learning to Program in LISP1Cognitive Science, 1984
- Acquisition of cognitive skill.Psychological Review, 1982
- Repair Theory: A Generative Theory of Bugs in Procedural SkillsCognitive Science, 1980