The Relative Importance of Patient-Reported Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening
Authors:
- Resa M. JonesRJResa M. Jones
- Steven H. WoolfSWSteven H. Woolf
- Tina D. CunninghamTCTina D. Cunningham
- Robert E. JohnsonRJRobert E. Johnson
- Alex H. KristAKAlex H. Krist
- Stephen F. RothemichSRStephen F. Rothemich
- Sally W. VernonSVSally W. Vernon
- 1 May 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Vol. 38 (5) , 499-507
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patient-Reported Barriers to Colorectal Cancer ScreeningAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2010
- THE PRIORITY IS SCREENING, NOT COLONOSCOPYAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2009
- Construct Validity and Invariance of Four Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer Screening across Gender, Race, and Prior ScreeningCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2008
- Effect of Incentives and Mailing Features on Online Health Program EnrollmentAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2008
- Barriers to Screening Colonoscopy for Low-income Latino and White Patients in an Urban Community Health CenterJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2008
- Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: A qualitative studyBMC Family Practice, 2008
- Colorectal cancer screening among Latinos from U.S. cities along the Texas–Mexico borderCancer Causes & Control, 2007
- Colorectal Cancer Screening among Low-Income African Americans in East Harlem: A Theoretical Approach to Understanding Barriers and Promoters to ScreeningJournal of Urban Health, 2006
- Colorectal Cancer Screening BeliefsCancer Practice, 2000
- Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood testThe Lancet, 1996