Short‐Term Changes in the Occlusal Contacts During Anterior Segmental Orthodontic Treatment With Clear Aligners in Adult Patients
Open Access
- 13 September 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
Abstract
Objective: To compare ClinCheck‐predicted and achieved maxillary occlusal contact areas immediately after an initial 14‐aligner anterior segmental sequence without programmed posterior movement. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 31 adult women treated with 14 maxillary and mandibular clear aligners. Bilateral first premolars through second molars were digitally locked. Predicted stage‐14 models and intraoral scans obtained immediately after aligner 14 and before refinement were assessed at maximum intercuspation. Contact regions at 0.00‐mm clearance were quantified with ImageJ. The primary outcome was the patient‐level total posterior achieved‐minus‐predicted difference. Tooth‐type differences were analysed using patient‐clustered generalized estimating equations with Holm adjustment; bite‐ramp comparisons were exploratory. Results: Predicted and achieved total posterior areas were 63.71 ± 36.56 and 30.30 ± 18.26 mm 2 , respectively (mean difference, −33.41 mm 2 ; 95% CI, −44.42 to −22.40; p < 0.001). After Holm adjustment, the achieved central‐incisor area was 0.49 mm 2 greater than predicted ( p = 0.003), whereas areas were smaller at the first premolars, second premolars, first molars, and second molars by 3.09, 5.44, 11.46, and 13.42 mm 2 , respectively (adjusted p ≤ 0.016). Lateral‐incisor and canine differences were not significant. Bite‐ramp groups did not differ significantly. Conclusion: After 14 aligners, the achieved posterior contact area was substantially smaller than predicted despite no programmed posterior movement. This early discrepancy supports direct evaluation of posterior contacts before refinement.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Occlusal contact changes in patients treated with clear aligners: A retrospective evaluation using digital dental modelsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2024
- Short-term effect of orthodontic clear aligners on muscular activity and occlusal contacts: A cohort studyAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2023
- Predictability of overbite control with the Invisalign appliance comparing SmartTrack with precision bite ramps to EX30American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2022
- Unplanned molar intrusion after Invisalign treatmentAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2022
- Predicted and actual outcome of anterior intrusion with Invisalign assessed with cone-beam computed tomographyAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2021
- Occlusal contact area changes with different retention protocols: 1-year follow-upAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2020
- Outcome assessment of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment compared with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading systemAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2005
- Normal masticatory performance in young adults and childrenArchives of Oral Biology, 1996
- Measurement of occlusal contact area effective in masticationAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1949
- The philosophy of the tooth positioning applianceAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Oral Surgery, 1945