How do institutional shareholders manipulate corporate environmental strategy to protect their equity value? A study of the adoption of ISO 14001 by Egyptian firms
Author:
- 22 November 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Business Strategy and the Environment
- Vol. 19 (8) , 495-511
Abstract
Theoretical as well as empirical evidence regarding the influence of institutional ownership on corporate environmental strategy not only is inconclusive but also reflects experience from either the Anglo‐American context or other developed countries. The underlying assumption of most of this literature is that institutional shareholders are always ‘active’ or ‘passive’ in their actions towards corporate environmental strategy. However, this study argues that this relationship might be moderated by various motivations such as legitimizing existence and operations, conforming with industry norms or lessening managerial entrenchment. Econometric analysis, using a sample of Egyptian firms, as hypothesized, demonstrated that institutional ownership exerted positive and significant effects on a corporation's tendency to adopt environmental management standards only when financial resources are available and investment opportunities are limited. A possible explanation of this finding is that Egyptian institutional investors are more likely to use corporate environmental responsibility to offset their inability to confront managerial discretionary power. An implication of this finding is that not only will different types of stakeholder ask for different levels of social and environmental responsibility, but also the same type of stakeholder may ask for different levels of social and environmental responsibility in different contexts. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.Keywords
This publication has 83 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exploring the moderating effect of financial performance on the relationship between corporate environmental responsibility and institutional investors: some Egyptian evidenceCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2008
- Priorities for corporate social responsibility: a survey of businesses and their stakeholdersCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2007
- Does the market value corporate environmental responsibility? An empirical examinationCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2007
- Institutional Ownership and Corporate Social Performance: The Moderating Effects of Investment Horizon, Activism, and CoordinationJournal of Management, 2006
- Can Managerial Discretion Explain Observed Leverage Ratios?The Review of Financial Studies, 2003
- Seeing the Need for ISO 14001Journal of Management Studies, 2003
- Critical factors for implementing ISO 14001 standard in United States industrial companiesJournal of Cleaner Production, 2003
- ENVIRONMENTAL (‘GREEN’) MANAGEMENT TYPOLOGIES: AN EVALUATION, OPERATIONALIZATION AND EMPIRICAL DEVELOPMENTBusiness Strategy and the Environment, 1996
- EFFECTS OF CORPORATE OWNERSHIP AND BOARD STRUCTURE ON CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE.Academy of Management Proceedings, 1993
- Monetary Policies and the Economy: The Transmission MechanismSouthern Economic Journal, 1978