HIV programme sustainability in Southern and Eastern Africa and the changing role of external assistance for health
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 January 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Health Policy and Planning
- Vol. 39 (Supplement) , i107-i117
Abstract
High human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–prevalence countries in Southern and Eastern Africa continue to receive substantial external assistance (EA) for HIV programming, yet countries are at risk of transitioning out of HIV aid without achieving epidemic control. We sought to address two questions: (1) to what extent has HIV EA in the region been programmed and delivered in a way that supports long-term sustainability and (2) how should development agencies change operational approaches to support long-term, sustainable HIV control? We conducted 20 semi-structured key informant interviews with global and country-level respondents coupled with an analysis of Global Fund budget data for Malawi, Uganda, and Zambia (from 2017 until the present). We assessed EA practice along six dimensions of sustainability, namely financial, epidemiological, programmatic, rights-based, structural and political sustainability. Our respondents described HIV systems’ vulnerability to donor departure, as well as how development partner priorities and practices have created challenges to promoting long-term HIV control. The challenges exacerbated by EA patterns include an emphasis on treatment over prevention, limiting effects on new infection rates; resistance to service integration driven in part by ‘winners’ under current EA patterns and challenges in ensuring coverage for marginalized populations; persistent structural barriers to effectively serving key populations and limited capacity among organizations best positioned to respond to community needs; and the need for advocacy given the erosion of political commitment by the long-term and substantive nature of HIV EA. Our recommendations include developing a robust investment case for primary prevention, providing operational support for integration processes, investing in local organizations and addressing issues of political will. While strategies must be locally crafted, our paper provides initial suggestions for how EA partners could change operational approaches to support long-term HIV control and the achievement of universal health coverage.Keywords
Funding Information
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-016750)
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-016750)
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- What does sustainability mean in the HIV and AIDS response?African Journal of AIDS Research, 2016
- Transitioning a Large Scale HIV/AIDS Prevention Program to Local Stakeholders: Findings from the Avahan Transition EvaluationPLOS ONE, 2015
- PEPFAR Transitions to Country Ownership: Review of Past Donor Transitions and Application of Lessons Learned to the Eastern CaribbeanGlobal Health: Science and Practice, 2015
- Applying lessons learned from the USAID family planning graduation experience to the GAVI graduation processHealth Policy and Planning, 2014
- An Agenda for Research on the Sustainability of Public Health ProgramsAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2011
- Understanding pathways for scaling up health services through the lens of complex adaptive systemsHealth Policy and Planning, 2011
- HIV prevention transformed: the new prevention research agendaThe Lancet, 2011
- Sustainability science: an integrated approach for health-programme planningThe Lancet, 2008
- Associations of Neighborhood Characteristics With the Location and Type of Food StoresAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2006
- HIV INFECTIONS AND AIDS IN THE 1990SAnnual Review of Public Health, 1990