Applying RE-AIM to examine the impact of an implementation facilitation package to scale up a program for Veterans with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Preprint
- 8 June 2023
- preprint
- Published by Springer Nature in Research Square
Abstract
Background U.S. Veterans are four-times more likely to be diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) compared to the civilian population with no care model that consistently improves Veteran outcomes when scaled. COPD Coordinated Access to Reduce Exacerbations (CARE) is a care bundle intended to improve the delivery of evidence-based practices to Veterans. To address challenges to scaling this program in the Veterans’ Health Administration (VA), the COPD CARE Academy (Academy), an implementation facilitation package comprised of four implementation strategies was designed and implemented. Methods This evaluation utilized a mixed-methods approach to assess the impact of the Academy’s implementation strategies on the RE-AIM framework implementation outcomes and the extent to which they were effective at increasing clinicians’ perceived capability to implement COPD CARE. A survey was administered one week after Academy participation and a semi-structured interview conducted eight to 12 months later. Descriptive statistics were calculated for quantitative items and thematic analysis was used to analyze open-ended items. Results Thirty-six clinicians from 13 VA medical centers (VAMCs) participated in the Academy in 2020 and 2021 and 264 front-line clinicians completed COPD CARE training. Adoption of the Academy was indicated by high rates of Academy completion (97%), session attendance (90%), and high utilization of Academy resources. Clinicians reported the Academy to be acceptable and appropriate as an implementation package and clinicians from 92% of VAMCs reported long-term utilization of Academy resources. Effectiveness of the Academy was represented by clinicians’ significant increases (p < 0.05) in their capability to complete ten implementation tasks after Academy participation. Conclusions This evaluation found that the use of implementation facilitation paired with additional strategies seemed to demonstrate positive implementation outcomes across all RE-AIM domains and identified areas for potential improvement. Future assessments are needed to explore post-academy resources that would help VAMCs to strategize localized approaches to overcome barriers.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- A care-bundles approach to improving standard of care in AECOPD admissions: results of a national project: Table 1Thorax, 2015
- A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) projectImplementation Science, 2015
- Barriers to evidence‐based medicine: a systematic reviewJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2014
- Epidemiology and clinical impact of major comorbidities in patients with COPDInternational Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 2014
- Identifying the challenges and facilitators of implementing a COPD care bundleBMJ Open Respiratory Research, 2014
- Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research AgendaAdministration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 2010
- Rehospitalizations among Patients in the Medicare Fee-for-Service ProgramNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Predictors of Rehospitalization and Death After a Severe Exacerbation of COPDChest, 2007
- Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.American Journal of Public Health, 1999
- Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review, 1977