Community-engaged artificial intelligence research: A scoping review
Open Access
- 23 August 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS Digital Health
- Vol. 3 (8) , e0000561
Abstract
The degree to which artificial intelligence healthcare research is informed by data and stakeholders from community settings has not been previously described. As communities are the principal location of healthcare delivery, engaging them could represent an important opportunity to improve scientific quality. This scoping review systematically maps what is known and unknown about community-engaged artificial intelligence research and identifies opportunities to optimize the generalizability of these applications through involvement of community stakeholders and data throughout model development, validation, and implementation. Embase, PubMed, and MEDLINE databases were searched for articles describing artificial intelligence or machine learning healthcare applications with community involvement in model development, validation, or implementation. Model architecture and performance, the nature of community engagement, and barriers or facilitators to community engagement were reported according to PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Of approximately 10,880 articles describing artificial intelligence healthcare applications, 21 (0.2%) described community involvement. All articles derived data from community settings, most commonly by leveraging existing datasets and sources that included community subjects, and often bolstered by internet-based data acquisition and subject recruitment. Only one article described inclusion of community stakeholders in designing an application–a natural language processing model that detected cases of likely child abuse with 90% accuracy using harmonized electronic health record notes from both hospital and community practice settings. The primary barrier to including community-derived data was small sample sizes, which may have affected 11 of the 21 studies (53%), introducing substantial risk for overfitting that threatens generalizability. Community engagement in artificial intelligence healthcare application development, validation, or implementation is rare. As healthcare delivery occurs primarily in community settings, investigators should consider engaging community stakeholders in user-centered design, usability, and clinical implementation studies to optimize generalizability.Keywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ambulatory Detection of Isolated Rapid‐Eye‐Movement Sleep Behavior Disorder Combining Actigraphy and QuestionnaireMovement Disorders, 2022
- A machine-learning approach to discerning prevalence and causes of myopia among elementary students in HubeiInternational Ophthalmology, 2022
- Brief digital sleep questionnaire powered by machine learning prediction models identifies common sleep disordersSleep Medicine, 2020
- Sample-Size Determination Methodologies for Machine Learning in Medical Imaging Research: A Systematic ReviewCanadian Association of Radiologists Journal, 2019
- Development of a machine learning algorithm for prediction of failure of nonoperative management in spinal epidural abscessThe Spine Journal, 2019
- Cerebellar Gray Matter Volume Is Associated With Cognitive Function and Psychopathology in AdolescenceBiological Psychiatry, 2019
- Artificial Intelligence in Health CareJAMA, 2019
- Machine Learning and Health Care Disparities in DermatologyJAMA Dermatology, 2018
- The clinical imperative for inclusivity: Race, ethnicity, and ancestry (REA) in genomicsHuman Mutation, 2018
- Strategies for Academic and Clinician Engagement in Community-Participatory Partnered ResearchJAMA, 2007