Team performance in process control: influences of interface design and staffing levels
Author:
- 1 August 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Ergonomics
- Vol. 43 (8) , 1210-1236
Abstract
A study performed at the OECD Halden Reactor Project compared the effects of interface design and staffing levels on various aspects of team performance. Teams of nuclear power plant operators participated in challenging simulator scenarios, working in either a simulated conventional plant, with a hard-control interface, or in a simulated advanced plant, with a computerized interface. Twoteam staffing levels, normal and minimum, were evaluated in each plant condition. All teams participated in the same five study conditions, lasting 1– 3 h each. Several measures assessed team performance: situation awareness, workload, rated team interactions, rated overall performance and objective performance. The findings revealed that combinations of interface design and staffing levels supported different aspects of performance. Larger crews consistently performed better than smaller crews in the conventional plant. In the advanced plant, both crew types performed equally well; however, smaller crews had better situation awareness than larger crews. In general, performance was better for crews using the advanced plant interface, but workload was higher. Workload also was consistently higher in the smaller crews than in the larger crews, regardless of interface type. Links between the performance measures were also noted.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development of a situation awareness measure to evaluate advanced alarm systems in nuclear power plant control roomsErgonomics, 1995
- The Measurement of Team ProcessHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1995
- Performance Consequences of Automation-Induced 'Complacency'The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1993
- Advanced control rooms and crew performance issues: implications for human reliabilityIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 1992
- Team Performance in Dynamic SystemsProceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 1991
- Collaborative Decision Making in Dynamic SystemsProceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 1991
- Team Interaction Skills Evaluation Criteria for Nuclear Power Plant Control Room OperatorsProceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 1991
- Predictive Utility of an Objective Measure of Situation AwarenessProceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 1990
- Definitely not a breeze: Extending an operant model of effective supervision to teams.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989
- Dyads and triads at 35,000 feet: Factors affecting group process and aircrew performance.American Psychologist, 1984