A Hybrid Human–Machine Learning Approach for Screening Prostate Biopsies Can Improve Clinical Efficiency Without Compromising Diagnostic Accuracy
Authors:
Open Access
- 30 September 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine in Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
- Vol. 146 (6) , 727-734
Abstract
Context.—: Prostate cancer is a common malignancy, and accurate diagnosis typically requires histologic review of multiple prostate core biopsies per patient. As pathology volumes and complexity increase, new tools to improve the efficiency of everyday practice are keenly needed. Deep learning has shown promise in pathology diagnostics, but most studies silo the efforts of pathologists from the application of deep learning algorithms. Very few hybrid pathologist–deep learning approaches have been explored, and these typically require complete review of histologic slides by both the pathologist and the deep learning system. Objective.—: To develop a novel and efficient hybrid human–machine learning approach to screen prostate biopsies. Design.—: We developed an algorithm to determine the 20 regions of interest with the highest probability of malignancy for each prostate biopsy; presenting these regions to a pathologist for manual screening limited the initial review by a pathologist to approximately 2% of the tissue area of each sample. We evaluated this approach by using 100 biopsies (29 malignant, 60 benign, 11 other) that were reviewed by 4 pathologists (3 urologic pathologists, 1 general pathologist) using a custom-designed graphical user interface. Results.—: Malignant biopsies were correctly identified as needing comprehensive review with high sensitivity (mean, 99.2% among all pathologists); conversely, most benign prostate biopsies (mean, 72.1%) were correctly identified as needing no further review. Conclusions.—: This novel hybrid system has the potential to efficiently triage out most benign prostate core biopsies, conserving time for the pathologist to dedicate to detailed evaluation of malignant biopsies.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays via deep learningScientific Reports, 2018
- A survey on deep learning in medical image analysisMedical Image Analysis, 2017
- Atypical small acinar proliferation and two or more cores of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia on a previous prostate biopsy are significant predictors of cancer during a transperineal template-guided saturation biopsy aimed at sampling one core for each 1 mL of prostate volumeResearch and Reports in Urology, 2017
- Interobserver Reproducibility of Percent Gleason Pattern 4 in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Prostate BiopsiesAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2016
- Deep learning as a tool for increased accuracy and efficiency of histopathological diagnosisScientific Reports, 2016
- The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic CarcinomaAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2016
- Patterns of Repeat Prostate Biopsy in Contemporary Clinical PracticeJournal of Urology, 2015
- The Becton Dickinson FocalPoint GS Imaging SystemAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2009
- ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database2009
- Automated screening versus manual screening: A comparison of the ThinPrep® imaging system and manual screening in a time studyDiagnostic Cytopathology, 2007