Validity of CBM measures of oral reading fluency and reading comprehension on high-stakes reading assessments in Grades 7 and 8
- 27 March 2014
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Reading and Writing
- Vol. 28 (1) , 57-104
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reliability and Validity of Oral Reading Fluency Median and Mean Scores Among Middle Grade Readers When Using Equated TextsReading Psychology, 2012
- Adolescent struggling readers in urban schools: Results of a Latent Class AnalysisLearning and Individual Differences, 2011
- An Experimental Study of Scheduling and Duration of “Tier 2” First-Grade Reading InterventionJournal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2011
- Applied Curriculum-Based Measurement as a Predictor of High-Stakes Assessment: Implications for Researchers and TeachersThe Elementary School Journal, 2011
- Exploring Sources of Reading Comprehension Difficulties Among Language Minority Learners and Their Classmates in Early AdolescenceAmerican Educational Research Journal, 2010
- Creating a Progress-Monitoring System in Reading for Middle-School Students: Tracking Progress Toward Meeting High-Stakes StandardsLearning Disabilities Research & Practice, 2010
- Form effects on the estimation of students' oral reading fluency using DIBELSJournal of School Psychology, 2007
- Relationship of reading fluency assessment data with state accountability test scores: A longitudinal comparison of grade levelsPsychology in the Schools, 2006
- Research on Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies: The Promise and Limitations of Peer-Mediated InstructionReading & Writing Quarterly, 2006
- Grade‐Level Invariance of a Theoretical Causal Structure Predicting Reading Comprehension With Vocabulary and Oral Reading FluencyEducational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2005