Separating natural responses from experimental artefacts: habitat selection by a diadromous fish species using odours from conspecifics and natural stream water
- 13 January 2009
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Oecologia
- Vol. 159 (3) , 679-687
Abstract
Animals use sensory stimuli to assess and select habitats, mates and food as well as to communicate with other individuals. One way they do this is to use olfaction, whereby they identify and respond to chemical cues. All organisms release odours, which mix with other chemical substances and ambient environmental conditions. The result is that animals are frequently immersed in a complex, highly dynamic sensory environment where they must identify and respond to only some of the potential stimuli they encounter in the face of significant levels of background noise. Understanding how organisms respond to different chemical cues is therefore dependent on knowing how these responses might be influenced by potential interactions with other stimuli. To test this, we examined whether the diadromous fish Galaxias maculatus was attracted to conspecific odours and whether this response differed when cues were offered in an artificial environment lacking other potential chemical stimuli (tap water) or a more natural background environment (stream water). We found that (1) fish responded to both natural stream water odours and those from conspecifics but the response to the latter was stronger; (2) the attraction to conspecific odours was stronger in tap water than in stream water, which indicates the importance of these odours may be overestimated when they are offered in artificial media. We also conducted a brief literature review, which confirmed that artificial media are commonly used in experiments and that the background environment is often not considered. Our results show that future research testing the responses of organisms to auditory, olfactory and visual cues should carefully consider the context in which cues are presented. Without doing so, such studies may inaccurately assess the importance of sensory cues in natural situations in the wild.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predator related oviposition site selection of aquatic beetles (Hydroporus spp.) and effects on offspring life‐historyFreshwater Biology, 2006
- Acoustic Communication in Noise2005
- Attraction of migratory inanga (Galaxias maculatus) and koaro (Galaxias brevipinnis) juveniles to adult galaxiid odoursNew Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 2003
- Effect of fall height and notch shape on the passage of inanga (Galaxias maculatus) and common bullies (Gobiomorphus cotidianus) over an experimental weirNew Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 2003
- The Effect of Predator Chemical Cue Age on Antipredator Behavior in the Wolf Spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae)Journal of Insect Behavior, 2002
- Larval reef fish could use odour for detection, retention and orientation to reefsMarine Ecology Progress Series, 2002
- Poor design of behavioural experiments gets poor results: examples from intertidal habitatsJournal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 2000
- Eddy Chemotaxis and Odor Landscapes: Exploration of Nature With Animal SensorsThe Biological Bulletin, 1996
- Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systemsPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 1993
- A genetic analysis of populations of Galaxias maculatus from the Bay of Plenty: Implications for natal river returnNew Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 1988