What do people benefit from a citizen science programme? Evidence from a Rwandan citizen science programme on malaria control
Open Access
- 6 August 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Malaria Journal
- Vol. 19 (1) , 1-13
Abstract
Background: Malaria control remains a challenge globally and in malaria-endemic countries in particular. In Rwanda, a citizen science programme has been set up to improve malaria control. Citizens are involved in collecting mosquito species and reporting mosquito nuisance. This study assessed what people benefit from such a citizen science programme. The analysis was conducted on how the citizen science programme influenced perceptions and behaviour related to malaria control.Methods: This study employed a mixed-methods approach using dissemination workshops, a survey, and village meetings as the main data collection methods. Dissemination workshops and village meetings involved 112 volunteers of the citizen science programme and were conducted to explore: (1) the benefits of being involved in the programme and (2) different ways used to share malaria-related information to non-volunteers. The survey involved 328 people (110 volunteers and 218 non-volunteers) and was used to compare differences in malaria-related perceptions and behaviour over time (between 2017 and 2019), as well as between volunteers and non-volunteers.Results: Malaria-related perceptions and behaviour changed significantly over time (between 2017 and 2019) and became favourable to malaria control. When the findings were compared between volunteers and non-volunteers, for perceptions, only perceived self-efficacy showed a significant difference between these two groups. However, volunteers showed significantly more social interaction, participation in malaria-related activities at the community level, and indoor residual spraying (IRS) acceptance. In addition, both volunteers and non-volunteers reported to have gained knowledge and skills about the use of malaria control measures in general, and mosquito species in particular among volunteers.Conclusion: The reported knowledge and skills gained among non-volunteers indicate a diffusion of the citizen science programme-related information in the community. Thus, the citizen science programme has the potential to provide individual and collective benefits to volunteers and society at large.Keywords
Funding Information
- Wageningen University Fund
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Citizen science participation in research in the environmental sciences: key factors related to projects’ success and longevityAnais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 2017
- What are the prospects for citizen science in agriculture? Evidence from three continents on motivation and mobile telephone use of resource-poor farmersPLOS ONE, 2017
- Place‐based and data‐rich citizen science as a precursor for conservation actionConservation Biology, 2016
- An Analysis of Citizen Science Based Research: Usage and Publication PatternsPLOS ONE, 2015
- Citizen science for policy development: The case of koala management in South AustraliaEnvironmental Science & Policy, 2015
- Approaches to passive mosquito surveillance in the EUParasites & Vectors, 2015
- Citizen Science: A Tool for Integrating Studies of Human and Natural SystemsAnnual Review of Environment and Resources, 2014
- Key issues and new approaches for evaluating citizen‐science learning outcomesFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2012
- Evolution MegaLab: a case study in citizen science methodsMethods in Ecology and Evolution, 2011
- Knowledge Gain and Behavioral Change in Citizen-Science ProgramsConservation Biology, 2011