Ionospheric Detection of Explosive Events
Open Access
- 11 February 2019
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Reviews of Geophysics
- Vol. 57 (1) , 78-105
Abstract
The ionospheric response to explosions which occur at or below the Earth's surface has been noted since the first detonations of nuclear devices during the early period of aboveground testing. Acoustic gravity waves and traveling ionospheric disturbances were detected in association with test explosions carried out by the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics in Novaya Zemlya in 1961. While research in this area has continued, the standards accepted by the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty for detection and confirmation of nuclear explosions have been based on (1) seismic, (2) hydroacoustic, (3) infrasound, and (4) radionuclide monitoring from ground detectors. We suggest that ionospheric sensing offers a complementary methodology that may allow for robust confirmation of explosive events. One method of ionospheric monitoring of explosive events is analysis of total electron content (TEC), available by processing data from Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers distributed globally on land masses. Traveling ionospheric disturbances observed by their signature in TEC have been used to detect and confirm mine collapses, mine blasts, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and meteorite strikes as well as underground nuclear tests. While an integrated measurement like TEC is not as sensitive to small‐amplitude density perturbations as other methods, the existence of large networks of continuously operating GNSS stations makes this an intriguing new monitoring asset. We report on the current capabilities for detection of explosions via the ionosphere, the outstanding challenges, and prospects for future developments that have potential to augment the current standards for detection and confirmation of nuclear detonations. By leveraging the worldwide network of GNSS receivers, robust confirmation of impulsive events is possible. This methodology complements existing technologies approved by the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. The article outlines background theory, new approaches to monitoring of explosions, and challenges that remain to be addressed.Keywords
This publication has 142 references indexed in Scilit:
- Model of traveling ionospheric disturbancesJournal of Space Weather and Space Climate, 2013
- Ionospheric observations of underground nuclear explosions (UNE) using GPS and the Very Large ArrayRadio Science, 2013
- From Sumatra 2004 to Tohoku‐Oki 2011: The systematic GPS detection of the ionospheric signature induced by tsunamigenic earthquakesJournal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2013
- Ionospheric signatures of Tohoku‐Oki tsunami of March 11, 2011: Model comparisons near the epicenterRadio Science, 2012
- A new technique for spectral analysis of ionospheric TEC fluctuations observed with the Very Large Array VHF system: From QP echoes to MSTIDsRadio Science, 2012
- Explosion energy of the 2004 eruption of the Asama Volcano, central Japan, inferred from ionospheric disturbancesGeophysical Research Letters, 2006
- Giant ionospheric disturbances excited by the M9.3 Sumatra earthquake of 26 December 2004Geophysical Research Letters, 2006
- High resolution mapping of TEC perturbations with the GSI GPS Network over JapanGeophysical Research Letters, 1998
- Gravity waves determined by modeling of traveling ionospheric disturbances in incoherent‐scatter radar measurementsRadio Science, 1995
- GPS detection of ionospheric perturbations following the January 17, 1994, Northridge EarthquakeGeophysical Research Letters, 1995