Compensation Claims After Treatment of Achilles Tendon Ruptures in Norway From 2010 to 2020
Open Access
- 1 July 2025
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
- Vol. 10 (3)
Abstract
Background: Compensation claims caused by medical treatment errors provide valuable insights into patients' experiences with received medical treatment and can help identify injuries and disabilities that might be preventable through optimized care. The objective of this retrospective descriptive study was to characterize accepted compensation claims filed after treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) in Norway, and to explore whether claim outcomes were associated with treatment modality or institutional catchment area. Methods: All claims filed to the Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation (NPE) after treatment of ATR between 2010 and 2020 were collected and categorized. The claims were organised based on whether they were accepted or denied, the initial treatment given, patient demographics, the reasons given by patients for filing claims, and the rationale provided by the NPE for accepting or rejecting compensation claims. Additionally, hospital patient catchment population were analyzed in relation to accepted claims. Results: One hundred forty-six compensation claims were received, of which 61 (41.8%) were accepted. Most accepted claims were related to surgical treatment (n = 30, 49%) or insufficient treatment (n = 22, 36%). The most frequent reason for claim acceptance was delayed diagnosis and/or treatment (15/61, 25%), followed by postoperative infections (10/61, 16%). There was no statistically significant correlation between accepted claims and institutional catchment area population. Conclusion: Delayed or missed diagnosis was the most common reason for accepted compensation claims following treatment for ATR. The study found no correlation between accepted claims and the catchment area population of the institution delivering the treatment. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective cohort study.Keywords
Funding Information
- Helse Sør-Øst RHF (2024085)
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Utility of Clinical Measures for the Diagnosis of Achilles Tendon Injuries: A Systematic Review With Meta-AnalysisJournal of Athletic Training, 2014
- Stable Surgical Repair With Accelerated Rehabilitation Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Acute Achilles Tendon RupturesThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2013
- MRI is Unnecessary for Diagnosing Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: Clinical Diagnostic CriteriaClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2012
- Deficits 10-Years after Achilles Tendon RepairInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 2012
- Effect of Complications After Minimally Invasive Surgical Repair of Acute Achilles Tendon RupturesThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2011
- Clarification of Terminology in Medication ErrorsDrug Safety, 2006
- Funnel plots for comparing institutional performanceStatistics in Medicine, 2004
- To Err Is Human2000
- The Clinical Diagnosis of Subcutaneous Tear of the Achilles TendonThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1998
- Ruptures of the tendo achillis. An objective assessment of surgical and non-surgical treatmentJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1976