On the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on mortality: Lost years or lost days?
Open Access
- 9 November 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Public Health
- Vol. 10, 1015501
Abstract
Objective: To quantify the (direct and indirect) impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on mortality for actual populations of persons living in 12 European countries in 2020.Method: Based on demographic and mortality data, as well as remaining life expectancies found in the Human Mortality Database, we calculated a “population life loss” in 2020 for men and women living in Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Finland, Hungary, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland. This quantity was obtained by dividing the total number of years lost in 2020 (estimated from all-cause mortality data and attributed directly or indirectly to COVID-19) by the size of the population.Results: A significant population life loss was found in 8 countries in 2020, with men losing an average of 8.7, 5.0, 4.4, 4.0, 3.7, 3.4, 3.1, and 2.7 days in Lithuania, Spain, Belgium, Hungary, Croatia, Portugal, Switzerland, and Sweden, respectively. For women, this loss was 5.5, 4.3, 3.7, 3.7, 3.1, 2.4, 1.6, and 1.4 days, respectively. No significant losses were found in Finland, Luxembourg, Denmark and Norway. Life loss was highly dependent on age, reaching 40 days at the age of 90 in some countries, while only a few significant losses occurred under the age of 60. Even in countries with a significant population life loss in 2020, it was on average about 30 times lower than in 1918, at the time of the Spanish flu.Conclusions: Our results based on the concept of population life loss were consistent with those based on the classical concept of life expectancy, confirming the significant impact of COVID-19 on mortality in 8 European countries in 2020. However, while life expectancy losses were typically counted in months or years, population life losses could be counted in days, a potentially useful piece of information from a public health perspective.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- COVID-19 and the Swedish enigmaThe Lancet, 2021
- Excess mortality: the gold standard in measuring the impact of COVID-19 worldwide?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2020
- Demographic perspectives on the mortality of COVID-19 and other epidemicsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2020
- Distinguishing between direct and indirect consequences of covid-19BMJ, 2020
- Theoretical Models and Operational Frameworks in Public Health EthicsInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2010
- Relationships between period and cohort life expectancy: Gaps and lagsPopulation Studies, 2006
- Standard expected years of life lost as a measure of mortality: norms and reference to New Zealand dataAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2004
- What Is Population Health?American Journal of Public Health, 2003
- The process of demographic translationDemography, 1964
- Comments on Mary Dempsey's article on Decline in tuberculosis; the death rate fails to tell the entire story.1948