Pyronaridine-artesunate granules versus artemether-lumefantrine crushed tablets in children with Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a randomized controlled trial
Authors:
- Kassoum KayentaoKKKassoum Kayentao
- Ogobara K DoumboODOgobara K Doumbo
- Louis K PénaliLPLouis K Pénali
- André T OffiananAOAndré T Offianan
- Kirana M BhattKBKirana M Bhatt
- Joshua KimaniJKJoshua Kimani
- Antoinette K TshefuATAntoinette K Tshefu
- Jack Ht KokolomamiJKJack Ht Kokolomami
- Michael RamharterMRMichael Ramharter
- Pablo Martinez de SalazarPSPablo Martinez de Salazar
- Alfred B TionoATAlfred B Tiono
- Alphonse OuédraogoAOAlphonse Ouédraogo
Open Access
- 31 October 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Malaria Journal
- Vol. 11 (1) , 364
Abstract
Background: Children are most vulnerable to malaria. A pyronaridine-artesunate pediatric granule formulation is being developed for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Methods: This phase III, multi-center, comparative, open-label, parallel-group, controlled clinical trial included patients aged ≤12 years, bodyweight ≥5 to 90% (P < .0001). Pyronaridine-artesunate was non-inferior to artemether-lumefantrine: treatment difference -1.8% (95% CI -4.3 to 1.6). The incidence of drug-related adverse events was 37.2% (132/355) with pyronaridine-artesunate, 44.4% (80/180) with artemether-lumefantrine. Clinical biochemistry results showed similar mean changes versus baseline in the two treatment groups. From day 3 until study completion, one patient in each treatment group had peak alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) and peak total bilirubin >2xULN (i.e. within the Hy’s law definition). Conclusions: The pyronaridine-artesunate pediatric granule formulation was efficacious and was non-inferior to artemether-lumefantrine. The adverse event profile was similar for the two comparators. Pyronaridine-artesunate should be considered for inclusion in paediatric malaria treatment programmes. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: identifier NCT00541385Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pyronaridine–Artesunate versus Mefloquine plus Artesunate for MalariaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Pyronaridine-Artesunate versus Chloroquine in Patients with Acute Plasmodium vivax Malaria: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority TrialPLOS ONE, 2011
- Cerebral Malaria: Mechanisms of Brain Injury and Strategies for Improved Neurocognitive OutcomePediatric Research, 2010
- Atypical brain response to novelty in rural African children with a history of severe falciparum malariaJournal of the Neurological Sciences, 2010
- Efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose oral combination of pyronaridine-artesunate compared with artemether-lumefantrine in children and adults with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a randomised non-inferiority trialThe Lancet, 2010
- Fixed‐Dose Pyronaridine‐Artesunate Combination for Treatment of Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria in Pediatric Patients in GabonThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2008
- Two fixed-dose artemisinin combinations for drug-resistant falciparum and vivax malaria in Papua, Indonesia: an open-label randomised comparisonThe Lancet, 2007
- Efficacy of Artesunate Plus Amodiaquine versus That of Artemether-Lumefantrine for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Childhood Plasmodium falciparum Malaria in Zanzibar, TanzaniaClinical Infectious Diseases, 2005
- A comparison of oral artesunate and artemether antimalarial bioactivities in acute falciparum malariaBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2001
- Severe falciparum malariaTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2000