Prediction of Significant Prostate Cancer at Prostate Biopsy and Per Core Detection Rate of Targeted and Systematic Biopsies Using Real-Time Shear Wave Elastography
Authors:
- Katharina BoehmKBKatharina Boehm
- Lars BudäusLBLars Budäus
- Pierre TennstedtPTPierre Tennstedt
- Burkhard BeyerBBBurkhard Beyer
- Jonas SchiffmannJSJonas Schiffmann
- Alessandro LarcherALAlessandro Larcher
- Kathrin SimonisKSKathrin Simonis
- Markus GraefenMGMarkus Graefen
- Dirk BeyersdorffDBDirk Beyersdorff
- Georg SalomonGSGeorg Salomon
- 3 June 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Urologia Internationalis
- Vol. 95 (2) , 189-196
Abstract
Introduction: Prostate cancer (PCa) detection is accompanied by overdiagnosis and mischaracterization of PCa. Therefore, new imaging modalities like shear wave elastography (SWE) are required. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate per-core detection rates (DRs) of targeted biopsies and systematic biopsies and to test if SWE findings can predict presence of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) at biopsy. Patients and Methods: Overall, 95 patients scheduled for prostate biopsy in our center underwent SWE. SWE findings were classified into suspicious or normal. Targeted biopsies were taken in up to 3 SWE-suspicious areas. csPCa was defined as the presence of Gleason pattern ≥4, level of prostate-specific antigen ≥10 ng/ml or >2 positive cores. Results: Overall DR for csPCa in our study cohort was 40%. Per-core DR for exclusively SWE-targeted cores versus systematic samples cores was 10.5 vs. 8.6% (p = 0.3). In the logistic regression models, individuals with suspicious SWE findings are at 6.4-fold higher risk of harboring csPCa (p = 0.03). Gain in predictive accuracy was 2.3% (0.82 vs. 0.84, p = 0.01). Conclusions: Presence of suspicious SWE findings is an independent predictor of csPCa. Therefore, SWE may be helpful in selecting patients for biopsy. Nonetheless, per-core DR for SWE-targeted cores was not statistically significant higher than DR of systematic sampled cores. Therefore, additional systematic biopsy is mandatory.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Critical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted, Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Transperineal Fusion Biopsy for Detection of Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 2013
- Transrectal quantitative shear wave elastography in the detection and characterisation of prostate cancerSurgical Endoscopy, 2013
- Transition Zone Prostate Cancer: Detection and Localization with 3-T Multiparametric MR ImagingRadiology, 2013
- Clinical application of shear wave elastography (SWE) in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast diseasesBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2011
- Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the detection and localization of prostate cancer: combination of T2‐weighted, dynamic contrast‐enhanced and diffusion‐weighted imagingBJU International, 2010
- Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European StudyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Needle Biopsies on Autopsy Prostates: Sensitivity of Cancer Detection Based on True PrevalenceJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2007
- Decision Curve Analysis: A Novel Method for Evaluating Prediction ModelsMedical Decision Making, 2006
- Significant upgrading affects a third of men diagnosed with prostate cancer: predictive nomogram and internal validationBJU International, 2006
- The zonal anatomy of the prostateThe Prostate, 1981